Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Posts
0
2625
Risk in defrag
I need to defrag 2 raid groups on a cx300 (flare 02.24.300.5.17) .
Everyday, some luns are trespassing on this cx300.
Is there any risk to defrag a raid group in case a lun trespass during the operation ?
Everyday, some luns are trespassing on this cx300.
Is there any risk to defrag a raid group in case a lun trespass during the operation ?
RRR
5.7K Posts
0
August 31st, 2008 12:00
The LUN doesn't change at all
In my experience if you set the defrag speed to high on a CX300, all the work is done in about 5 hours or so. So if a slight performance impact isn't that important after office hours, start the defrag at high speed when you go home at 5PM.
RRR
5.7K Posts
0
September 2nd, 2008 08:00
shewitt1
45 Posts
0
September 2nd, 2008 08:00
shewitt1
45 Posts
0
September 3rd, 2008 07:00
I wonder if it runs at the same rate as LUN migrations or rebuilds. There is some good information in the latest Best Practices guide showing the rebuild rates for varios raid group types and how it affects application workloads.
Sorry I cannot be more specific.
RRR
5.7K Posts
0
September 3rd, 2008 23:00
sigma441
2 Posts
0
September 4th, 2008 02:00
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
September 4th, 2008 13:00
DGM3
238 Posts
0
September 4th, 2008 19:00
Also, reminder that the defrag operation performed by the array only acts to move LUNs within a RAID Group, in order to maximize contiguous free space available on the RAID Group - it has no effect/impact on files (as the storage system is not filesystem aware). How long it will take defrag to run, also depends on how many LUNs need to be moved. For a RAID Group that has never had a LUN deleted, there will be nothing to move.
Regards,
DGM
mpalumbo1
50 Posts
0
June 29th, 2009 10:00
Thanks,
Mike
RRR
5.7K Posts
0
June 30th, 2009 01:00
I'd say: try starting a defrag a high speed and if you don't notice any impact, let it run at that speed. Should you notice an impact, lower the speed to medium or low. Once started, you cannot stop it.
jps00
392 Posts
0
June 30th, 2009 04:00
The duration of a defrag is dependent on the size of the RAID group, the degree of fragmentation (how many and how big are the holes), the RAID type, and the drive type.
A defrag is not fast. Using RAID 4+1, with Fibre Channel drives, FLARE 26 on a CX3-80, cache off with a 1 thread 8kb 2:1 R:W load and a medium fragmentation the following rates were observed:
Load and High: 16 MB/s
Load and Medium: 1.5 MB/s
Load and Low: 3.5 MB/s
The abnormality with Medium load is noted. YMMV.
There is a summary description of defrag in "EMC CLARiiON Storage System Fundamentals for Performance and Availability" available on PowerLink. However, it does not contain much more (with exception of the short-cut) than the contents of this thread.
We are currently planning an update of the "The Effect of Priorities on LUN Management Operations" paper to include a detailed discussion of RAID group defrag. The information in that paper will be summarized in "EMC CLARiiON Best Practices for Performance and Availability, FLARE Revision 29" (or 30). Both of these updated documents will be available on Powerlink.
null
clarriion
17 Posts
0
July 15th, 2009 08:00
I have experienced a defrag getting stuck and unable to complete. I was told this was caused by a trespass occurring during the defrag.The advice I was given at the time was a reboot of the sps was need to clear the fault. In the end I managed to clear the problem by moving off one or all of luns from the Raid Group.
Message was edited by:
clarriion