Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
4 Posts
0
9084
DD6300 - failed to add new static route
Hello,
actually it is not possible to add a new entry fpr a static route for a new generated interface on DD63300.
Error :
Route command system error.
Usage: route [add|del] [net|host] target[/prefix] [netmask Nm] [gw Gw] [dev If] [table Tbl]
My Command on CLI:
route add -net 172.17.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.17.10.1 veth1.10
static route for a s
Why i can't add a new static route for the configured virtual Interface vet1.10 ????
Actual Configuration:
Table: main
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1d
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
172.17.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 veth1.10
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1a
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1d
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ethMa
IPv4 Default Gateways
gateway IP source
----------- ------
172.16.11.1 static
192.168.3.1 dhcp
----------- ------
kind regards
jbrooksuk
208 Posts
0
September 27th, 2017 03:00
The command reference docs are incorrect and do not reflect changes made in DDOS6, I've requested an update to them.
You need;
net route add net 172.17.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.17.10.1 dev veth1.10
That should work for you I think, the outputs don't really drive you to this subtle change but hopefully we'll be back on track with the docs soon.
HTH, Jonathan
Gunni75
4 Posts
0
September 27th, 2017 03:00
hello jbrooksu,
if i entered your command the cli-output is as follows:
Route command system error.
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
ble1
14.3K Posts
0
September 29th, 2017 03:00
I recently deployed one DD6300 and I did this via GUI which changed a bit - didn't do over CLI. I do not have access to it now, but I used 6.0.30 DDOS if I remember correctly and I actually added default route and the specific route for interface only.
Gunni75
4 Posts
0
September 29th, 2017 04:00
configuration via GUI results in the same error.
activating static route for a specific interface is not possible --> BUG ???
I will create/opened a support-case for this.
ble1
14.3K Posts
0
October 2nd, 2017 01:00
Check https://support.emc.com/kb/305970 I find a bit strange that file already exist message and it seems to be answered in that KB.
oldhercules
116 Posts
0
October 2nd, 2017 05:00
Hi!
I don't see why do you want to define a static route (and gw??) to 172.17.10/24..
You already have an interface in this network:
172.17.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 veth1.10
veth1.10 will be used for outgoing traffic to this subnet by default.
cfizz34341
1 Message
0
January 3rd, 2019 17:00
any update? i am also getting the same message but is that because it already exists?
acesetmlogin
1 Message
0
May 17th, 2021 22:00
Route command system error.
Usage: route [add|del] [net|host] target[/prefix] [netmask Nm] [gw Gw] [dev If] [table Tbl]
My Command on CLI:
route add -net 172.17.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.17.10.1 veth1.10
static route for a s
Why i can’t add a new static route for the configured virtual Interface vet1.10 ????
Actual Configuration:
Table: main
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1d
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
172.17.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 veth1.10
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1a
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1d
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ethMa
IPv4 Default Gateways
gateway IP source
———– ——
172.16.11.1 static
192.168.3.1 dhcp