Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

2976

February 18th, 2016 20:00

Performance drop in case of multiple file(1MB×32,768files) with Networker 9.0

Hello All,

We are using networker 9.0 with w2k12 r2 for backup and restore to/from our secondary storage device .

We used  different block size 32kb, 1024 kb media type adv_file.

observation from the gui of networker. : data transfer rate is  0 inbetween  during the execution of backup

Any one can help to find out  some tuning parameter.

14 Posts

February 18th, 2016 22:00

only incase of  small files , we checked the  backup 32gb single file  which seems  to us ok. yes we are using NAS

4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

February 18th, 2016 22:00

Hi rashi.jain,

        Is this just for the small file or have you checked the performance for larger files too? Have you tested backups using a large file (say 10GB) and compare the difference ? What kind of secondary storage are you using (is it a NAS box)?

4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

February 19th, 2016 01:00

And Since you are using a AFTD I assume you are using DSA backups. I dont see any tuning that can help your situation.

lets wait for the Top gun's B's anf H's  comments.

14.3K Posts

February 22nd, 2016 16:00

Small files will never be fast due to standard file system bottlenecks.  Have you tried BBB for specific case?

4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

February 22nd, 2016 19:00

Hrvoje Crvelin, the source data is NAS so BBB is not an option correct ?

rashi.jain,

          BBB is an abbreviation for Block Based backup.

14 Posts

February 22nd, 2016 19:00

what is BBB ?

14 Posts

February 22nd, 2016 22:00

no improvement has been observed

4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

February 22nd, 2016 23:00

Just to confirm you are doing NDMP backups correct ?

If yes, is it as DSA or native NDMP method ?

14.3K Posts

February 23rd, 2016 07:00

I don't think you can expect much better speeds with small files.  Did you try copy and do you get better speed?

14 Posts

February 23rd, 2016 20:00

yes, during the copy take less time

14 Posts

February 25th, 2016 01:00

we try same test with nw 8 which is fast than  nw9

14.3K Posts

February 25th, 2016 01:00

Fact that copy does it faster may indicate that some sort of tweaking is needed.  Since you mentioned nw9, did you had the same results with nw8 before or is this first time install?

14.3K Posts

February 27th, 2016 14:00

It could be something with nw9.  Assuming all necessary settings were the same for nw8.  In such case your best bet is to open support ticket with engineering.

14 Posts

February 28th, 2016 09:00

Can you please me  how to raise the ticket?

pls share the link.

4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

February 28th, 2016 23:00

Go to http :// www. support.emc.com

No Events found!

Top