Besides that it would look ugly, is there any reason I shouldn't add one IG as a child to another IG that already has WWN's in it? The parent IG would end up containing a mix of WWN's and child IG's. I would think this would work fine, but I worry it might have some kind of hidden consequences.
Thanks for your help!
Solved! Go to Solution.
what you propose is actually an illegal configuration. a parent IG can only have child IG as members. so..it would look ugly and it doesn't work :-)
my colleague Kevin pointed out that I was wrong :-) I confused the storage group rules with initiator group rules. What you propose is legal, however messy as you point out. I would caution that application of flags and consistent lun could get confusing with the mix of IG and WWN.
sorry for the confusion!