1 Nickel

Details on vSphere's native remote replication


One of the customers is looking for comparison between Recoverpoint vs. vSphere5.0's native remote replication. We have lot of points on RP which makes it great replication solution.

However, would appreciate if you could help me with details / considerations on vSphere's native replication. Few caveats / gotchas?



Tags (2)
0 Kudos
1 Reply
2 Iron

Re: Details on vSphere's native remote replication


Generally the competition stuffs are excluded from discussion for me. But please notice Recoverpoint is all-in-one appliance based solution unlike software remote repliation. It has flexible splitter deployments options and maximized performance by compression and other tech. The hightlight also contains integration with VMware site recover manager (SRM). So my point is maybe you can find a way to consolidate RP and vSphere. Agree?

0 Kudos