3 Argentum

## Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

Hi all

I have a customer with a VNX 5300 which is configured with 1 DPE and 2 DAE. DPE is equiped with 15x 300 GB disks, DAE 1 with 600 Disks and DAE 3 with 600 DB disks as well. BUT DAE 2 resp. its disks are not assigned yet.

Now is it possible to expand Pool 1 which contains 15x 300 GB Disks in a Raid (4+1) configuration with the additional 15x 600 GB Disks from DAE 2 with a Raid (4+1) as well WITHOUT capacity lost due to the different disk capacity? In my opinion it should be possible because the new disks are own raid groups and deliver the full capacity to the pool. I just need confirmation about this becuase you guys now you can not remove the disks afterwards

PS: I have two other questions. 1) What exactly happens when I use Raid 5 (8+1) with 15 Disks? Do I loose capacity or performance? I guess so but how exactly do I calcucalte this loss? 2) Why is a RAID 1/0 (10) built with 4+4 within EMC and not 2+2? As far as i understand a RAID 10 is a RAID 0 striped about two RAID 1 so in theory it should be possible to use it with 4 disks instead of 8. What happens if I choose RAID 10 (4+4) but only add 4 disks instead of 8?

Thanks for all your help which I really appreciate

Duke

Labels (2)

• ### VNXe

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
5 Rhenium

## Re: Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

When you add additional disks to an existing Pool, the new disks (600GB) will retain their capacity. The problem with disk capacity is when you try to make a raid group using both 300 and 600 disks - the available capacity will always be that of the smallest disk. Since your Pool is already using 300GB disks, adding the 600GB disks will create new private raid groups that do not include the 300GB disks.

If the existing raid type/width is  R5 4+1, you must use that with the 600GB disks. Add the 600GB disks in multiples of 5 (4+1). If you have 16 disks then add only 15 (three sets of 4+1).

1) What exactly happens when I use Raid 5 (8+1) with 15 Disks? Do I loose capacity or performance? I guess so but how exactly do I calcucalte this loss?

With 16 disks using 8+1, you will end up with one private raid group as 8+1 and the second private raid group as a 6+1 - this will lead to lower performance as the stripe width will be different - EMC recommends that you not do that.

2) Why is a RAID 1/0 (10) built with 4+4 within EMC and not 2+2? As far as i understand a RAID 10 is a RAID 0 striped about two RAID 1 so in theory it should be possible to use it with 4 disks instead of 8. What happens if I choose RAID 10 (4+4) but only add 4 disks instead of 8?

You can use a minimum of two disks on VNX1 arrays (1+1) if you want, EMC recommends using 8 (4+4) for best performance. You will get a warning about the recommended 8 disks when you create a new Pool using 4 (2+2) disks, but you can ignore that if you want.

I would recommend that you review the best practices guide for VNX1 - that contains a lot of the information that you're asking.

http://www.ndm.net/emcstore/pdf/vnx/h8268-vnx-block-best-practices.pdf

glen

8 Replies
3 Argentum

Jump to solution

No one?

2 Bronze

## Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

Why don't you create a new pool with the 600 GB drives you can migrate luns between the pools  if required.

Answer to the first of the other two questions you can't create Raid 5 (8+1) with 15 disks, it will only use disk increments of 9. So it would be 9 disks 18 disks or 27 disks etc

Useful document to read

https://www.emc.com/collateral/white-papers/h12682-vnx-best-practices-wp.pdf

3 Argentum

## Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

Hi

Thanks for your response. Well there is a certain reason to not create a new pool: mainly performance. So still my question is am I going to loose the new disks capacity when creating 3x RAID 5 (4+1) RAID sets with 600 GB disks within and existing pool with RAID 5 (4+1) with 300 GB disks?

Other questions:

Are you sure about the fact not to be able to create a RAID with an unequal of 9? I can remember to receive a message about that it is possible but not optimal better choose a multiple of 5, 9 etc. based on the RAID depth.

Cheers and thanks

2 Bronze

## Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

If it's RAID5 (4+1) it would use 5 disks RAID5 (8+1) would use 9 disks.

RAID5 with 15 disks would be (14+1) rebuild time would be very high.

As to pool performance different disk types of the same tier i.e. SAS in the same pool will lead to performance differences.

3 Argentum

## Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

Hi

Thanks again. It is less the RAID depth which interests me it is the capacity as mentioned above. What happens to the new RAID sets with the 600 GB disks, is only 300 GB usable of these 600GB or the full 600?

Now is it possible to expand Pool 1 which contains 15x 300 GB Disks in a Raid (4+1) configuration with the additional 15x 600 GB Disks from DAE 2 with a Raid (4+1) as well WITHOUT capacity lost due to the different disk capacity?

So still my question is am I going to loose the new disks capacity when creating 3x RAID 5 (4+1) RAID sets with 600 GB disks within and existing pool with RAID 5 (4+1) with 300 GB disks?

Thanks for you help

5 Rhenium

## Re: Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

When you add additional disks to an existing Pool, the new disks (600GB) will retain their capacity. The problem with disk capacity is when you try to make a raid group using both 300 and 600 disks - the available capacity will always be that of the smallest disk. Since your Pool is already using 300GB disks, adding the 600GB disks will create new private raid groups that do not include the 300GB disks.

If the existing raid type/width is  R5 4+1, you must use that with the 600GB disks. Add the 600GB disks in multiples of 5 (4+1). If you have 16 disks then add only 15 (three sets of 4+1).

1) What exactly happens when I use Raid 5 (8+1) with 15 Disks? Do I loose capacity or performance? I guess so but how exactly do I calcucalte this loss?

With 16 disks using 8+1, you will end up with one private raid group as 8+1 and the second private raid group as a 6+1 - this will lead to lower performance as the stripe width will be different - EMC recommends that you not do that.

2) Why is a RAID 1/0 (10) built with 4+4 within EMC and not 2+2? As far as i understand a RAID 10 is a RAID 0 striped about two RAID 1 so in theory it should be possible to use it with 4 disks instead of 8. What happens if I choose RAID 10 (4+4) but only add 4 disks instead of 8?

You can use a minimum of two disks on VNX1 arrays (1+1) if you want, EMC recommends using 8 (4+4) for best performance. You will get a warning about the recommended 8 disks when you create a new Pool using 4 (2+2) disks, but you can ignore that if you want.

I would recommend that you review the best practices guide for VNX1 - that contains a lot of the information that you're asking.

http://www.ndm.net/emcstore/pdf/vnx/h8268-vnx-block-best-practices.pdf

glen

3 Argentum

## Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

Hi

That was exactly what I was lookinf for! Wonderful and great news!

Thank you very much

Michael

6 Indium

## Re: Re: Capacity questions when expanding existing pools (RAID5, RAID10)

Jump to solution

plus Unisphere wizard will show you what is possible and what the resulting capacities are before committing to add the disks