Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
59 Posts
0
588
December 16th, 2008 09:00
Backing up a RM Snapshot
Good morning all,
Site Information:
RM 5.1.3
CLARiiON CX4-480
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the following:
I am taking a snapshot of a rather large LUN off of the CLARiiON and then mounting it to a "Dedicated" backup host. However because of how traditional backup software works (in this case we are using CommVault) it always sees that the snapshot LUN that is mounted as a "Full" because it sit's within a directory.
Basically my problem is everytime the snapshot gets mounted (because it gets mounted to M:\rm_mounts\T Drive) as a directory under a drive it wants to a do a full backup. Is there ANY way around this? Can RM snapshots not be mounted a straight drive or would that not matter because it would still see the archive bit as flipping?
Any help on this issue would be great. Oh yeah BTW it's a 10TB LUN
Site Information:
RM 5.1.3
CLARiiON CX4-480
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the following:
I am taking a snapshot of a rather large LUN off of the CLARiiON and then mounting it to a "Dedicated" backup host. However because of how traditional backup software works (in this case we are using CommVault) it always sees that the snapshot LUN that is mounted as a "Full" because it sit's within a directory.
Basically my problem is everytime the snapshot gets mounted (because it gets mounted to M:\rm_mounts\T Drive) as a directory under a drive it wants to a do a full backup. Is there ANY way around this? Can RM snapshots not be mounted a straight drive or would that not matter because it would still see the archive bit as flipping?
Any help on this issue would be great. Oh yeah BTW it's a 10TB LUN
No Events found!


AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
December 16th, 2008 13:00
You are taking a snapshot of a production LUN, and to the mount host that LUN is the full 10TB volume from another host. I think that since the mount host is not the host that owns the LUN, it will not be able to set the correct archive bits to perform incremental or differential backups.
I use snaps of clones to backup some of our production SQL servers and we run full backups every day off of the snapshots. But since this is a snap of a clone it does not matter since there is no impact to production. The backup can take as long as it needs to.
A 10TB LUN is a different challenge though. Have you looked at using a dedupe backup target instead? We also have DataDomain DeDupe backup arrays and use CommVault to backup directly from production (or snap of clone) to DataDomain disk arrays and get great compression. You could do something similar.
csmykay1
59 Posts
0
January 5th, 2009 07:00
Thanks for the reply thought.
AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
January 5th, 2009 08:00
If there is not a large amount of change rate in the data I would look into dedupe solutions that will allow you to backup from production with little impact to production. Have you looked at dedupe products?