Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

1048

August 5th, 2010 12:00

Add Windows 2003 host to Storage Groups

I’ve a Windows 2003 server (32-bit) running BackupExec 2010 named BKSERVER.  I’ve installed  Navi Windows Host Agent v6.28..22.0.35 on this server and the server has an HBA zoned in Cisco 9124e to see the EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 SAN (SPA and SPB).

From the EMC SAN, it shows that the HBA is logged in and registered.  On this SAN, I currently have 2 Storage Groups (VMWare and NG).

VMWare Storage Group contains 6 VMware ESX Hosts v3.5 Update 5 and NG Storage Group contains 2 Windows 2008 64-bit servers.

I would like to have the BKSERVER to be able to see and read all LUNs so that I can backup the Virtual Machines (*.vmdk files) more efficiently by adding the server to both Storage Groups (without adding the server to the Storage Groups, I do not see the BKSERVER server listed under the Storage tab in the EMC SAN, although the BKSERVER server is currentlylisted under the Hosts tab.)

I do not plan to write any data to the LUNs that all servers in both Storage Groups can see and access from the BKSERVER server

Is there any potential problem that you can see if I add the Windows 2003 server to the existing Storage Groups – VMWare Farm and NG?

My thinking is that if the BKSERVER server has a direct connection to the SAN, then all virtual machine backup traffic should go through the fiber connection between them instead of going over the Ethernet side.

Thanks for your input

August 5th, 2010 12:00

One problem:  Windows 2003.  In this scenario, if the LUNs are made visible to BKSERVER, it will try and write a disk signature to the drives.  That means that BKSERVER is also able to write to the LUNs.  This is generally not a good thing, without a cluster-aware filesystem.

How about presenting a snapshot of the LUNs via SnapView instead?

Search Powerlink for "EMC CLARiion SnapView Snapshots and Snap Sessions Knowledgebook - A Detailed Review".  It will give you good information on using Snapshots in this regard.  Does this help?

20 Posts

August 5th, 2010 12:00

Thanks Karl for your very helful response.  I am unfamiliar with SnapView.  I can see that SnapView had already been installed on this CX4-240, so I'll read up on SnapView and try it out.

When taking a snapshot of a particular LUNs, is it correct that it should it be done during the lowest I/O time?

August 5th, 2010 13:00

To get the hang of it, you might want to try the Snapshot Wizard in Navisphere Manager.  It will walk through the steps to create LUNs for the Reserve LUN Pool (RLP), create and name a session and so on.

If you have multiple LUNs for your VMDK files, you can create a multi-LUN session and snap multiple LUNs at once for your backups.  This guide gives a good overview and introduces a few points of consideration as well.

Keep us up to date with your progress - be sure to ask more questions in the forums: there are more knowledgeable folks than I who can give you many more specifics.

Thanks!

20 Posts

August 5th, 2010 14:00

Thanks for your suggestion, Dynamox.

I've the VMware Option enabled in the BackupExec v2010, and BackupExec v2010 backs up Virtual Machines via its built-in VCB feature, so I did not need to have a separate VCB server.  However, backing up a large VMDK file (~300 GB) can take a long while to complete over 1 GB backbone.  The backup server has a 4-Gb HBA and I am trying to determine if I can backup the virtual machines via the fiber connection between the server running the backup sofware and the EMC SAN.

Are you backing up virtual machines in your environment?  If you do, what software do you use?

Thanks.

20 Posts

August 5th, 2010 14:00

Thanks very much Glen for your response.   Those links are very helpful.    After reading both Snapshots and Clones, I am leaning toward Cloning for less of I/O peformance impact, but I am not sure how long it would take to create and synchronize a 800GB LUN combined of 2 different LUNs.

Thanks.

1 Rookie

 • 

20.4K Posts

August 5th, 2010 14:00

have you looked into VCB ? That is the safest and supported way to do what you are trying to do.

1 Rookie

 • 

20.4K Posts

August 5th, 2010 14:00

your VMs will be crashed consistent,  as if somebody pull the power plug on them. If you want OS consistency look at VCB

http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/consolidated_backup.html

4.5K Posts

August 5th, 2010 14:00

In the documents section on this forum, you can find most of the Best Practice guides - for Snaps see:

CLARiiON SnapView Snapshots and Snap Sessions Knowledgebook—A Detailed Review.pdf

White Paper: EMC CLARiiON Snap Clones - A Detailed Review

You should also review the Best Practices for the version of Flare running on your array - that is also located in the Documents section:

EMC CLARiiON Performance and Availability Release 29.0 Firmware Update Applied Best Practices.pdf

glen

1 Rookie

 • 

20.4K Posts

August 5th, 2010 15:00

We are ..but at the guest level right now (using Avamar) . Looking at Veeam Backup for VMDK level backups.

190 Posts

August 6th, 2010 09:00

300GB for a VMDK is pretty huge - if it was an RDM you could snap it  and mount the disk directly to the BE server (assuming it is a WINDOWS VM).  I use Replication Manager to schedule the snaps/mounts for backups and the BE agent to grab the OS backup.  RM can quiesce NTFS volumes, SQL Server, Oracle, and a lot of other things to get a consistent copy of the data.  Having all of the data in a VMDK is nice because it is one "unit" but if you are sharing that LUN with other ESX servers with lots of VMDKs on it you may get reduced performance due to the disk being passed back and forth between the ESX servers...then again if your workload is medium to light you would probably never notice the difference.

Also, I don't know if this is true with 2010 (haven't upgraded yet) but in 12.5 Vmware backups were a B2D2T operation - meaning it copies the VMDK to temporary storage and then pushes it to tape.  Restores require this same temporary storage if you are trying to pull a single file out of the VMDK (see Granular Restore Technology to see the requirements).

Dan

20 Posts

August 6th, 2010 10:00

Thanks Dan for your input. Unfortunately, I don't have Replication Manager option installed yet, but I'll ask to see if possible to add it to next year's budget. For now, my backup option of VMDKs is limitted - SnapClone or SnapShot the LUNs to do the backup manually can be a real pain.

I didn't use BE12.5 so I don't know if backing up VMs have the similar options.  I had looked at VEEM in the past and it's simplest app. to install and use among others like Acronis, VizionCore.  The draw-back was that it didn't have the option to back up directly to tape for offsite storage - which we are required to do so at my current company.

No Events found!

Top