Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
5 Posts
0
25220
X1950 Pro AGP in Dell 8300
Hi,
I have been reading success stories about the 512Mb X1950 Pro AGP working in standard Dell 8300s with the 250W power supply.
I am currently looking to upgrade my card (9800 pro) to the X1950. Therefore I need a better power supply. I have seen the ones at pcpowersupply and dont believe they are powerfull enough.
The 410W silencer PSU only has a 12V @ 23A powerline.
HIS recommend a 12V @ 32A line so im not too keen on the dell power supplies.
Are there any other recommended PSUs that work in a Dell 8300 with no problems and have the 12V @ 32A line .
Also the card appears to be very long! and taking a look at my motherboard there appears to be some part of the motherboard jutting out that may restrict entering a large card.
Any help?
Conor
SR45
12.1K Posts
0
February 11th, 2007 16:00
2.6 Ghz 400 FSB
1 Gb 2100 DDR memory
Windows XP Home
120 Gb Seagate 7,200 drive
24 inch 2407 WFP
XFX 7800 GS O/C AGP
16x DVD-R
410 watt ( PcPower&Cooling )
(If I post the same answer as someone else, this is not because I like to give a second opinion, but my typing is slower than the others.)
conor76
5 Posts
0
February 11th, 2007 19:00
SR45
12.1K Posts
0
February 11th, 2007 21:00
As for video cards saying they need a 350/400W PSU, this is more or less a liberal number, and is more directed towards those that have loaded there computers with several optical drives, lots of PCI cards, etc. Dell underrates is power supply, also to be on the safe side, being more conservative. Now regarding the peak power wording. A PSU cannot maintain peak but for only a brief time, so this should be kept in mind when looking for a video card. You may have to upgrade the p/s to be on the safe side...
Dell rates its power supplies to read only the mean average, to be on the safe side (Being more conservative), and the peak power is much higher to handle better cards that suggest a more powerful power supply. The card manufacture only suggests a more powerful power supply, so if you install additional optical drives, and memory, it can handle the overload, or, they are just being more liberal.
This question is asked on a daily basis, and for a number of years. Many have upgraded their systems with a better video card that suggests a more powerful p/s, and they are doing just fine with their stock set up.
http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354 This graphic card watt comparison link was provided by another member. Good info to have
conor76
5 Posts
0
February 12th, 2007 17:00
SR45
12.1K Posts
0
February 12th, 2007 17:00
SR45
12.1K Posts
0
February 12th, 2007 18:00
2.6 Ghz 400 FSB
1 Gb 2100 DDR memory
Windows XP Home
120 Gb Seagate 7,200 drive
24 inch 2407 WFP
XFX 7800 GS O/C AGP
16x DVD-R
410 watt ( PcPower&Cooling )
______________________________________________________________
(If I post the same answer as someone else, this is not because I like to give a second opinion, but my typing is slower than the others, and posted slightly later.)
Message Edited by SR45 on 02-12-2007 04:00 PM
conor76
5 Posts
0
February 12th, 2007 18:00
Cypherus
336 Posts
0
February 13th, 2007 16:00
thundycat
17 Posts
0
February 28th, 2007 19:00
James Dickinson
PC Power & Cooling
conor76
5 Posts
0
February 28th, 2007 19:00
thundycat
17 Posts
0
February 28th, 2007 19:00
Message Edited by thundycat on 02-28-2007 09:21 PM
klbf
2.7K Posts
0
September 6th, 2007 13:00
Message Edited by klbf on 09-07-2007 02:55 AM
thundycat
17 Posts
0
September 6th, 2007 14:00
klbf
2.7K Posts
0
September 6th, 2007 23:00
My Web Site