Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

32985

February 5th, 2004 20:00

Recommend LCD Monitor

I have been reading the reviews of the new "Hitachi" lcds monitors. They seem to have something no one else has and that the fastest response rate. Also have good color , brightness etc . A response rate of 16ns. Thats very fast and excellent for gaming. They also have DVI and analog connectors. Another interesting thing I noticed about LCDs in general, the ones that they call ultra sharp seem to all have lower response rates. Maybe that related to clarity and sharpness somehow.

I'm a little reluctant to buy the Dell Monitors. I  would welcome any suggestions about any monitors to look for. Thanks

Jerry

23 Posts

February 5th, 2004 21:00

Anything from Samsung.  What size are you looking for?

142 Posts

February 5th, 2004 21:00

An 18". I just read 26 pages of problems with Dell flats and frankly I think I should wait . Is this problem only with Dells or other brands as well?

Jerry

23 Posts

February 6th, 2004 01:00

Well, I would reccomend the Samsung 192T.  It's a 19in monitor but a very sweet one.  Personally i have the Dell 1800FP and the Dell 2001FP on a custom built PC with a radeon 9800 Pro.  I have no problems with either monitor.

142 Posts

February 6th, 2004 17:00

Thanks for your recommendations. It was extremely nice of you.

Jerry

1K Posts

February 6th, 2004 19:00

The latest "Ultrasharp", the 2001FP has a very fast response time. I've got a 1504FP, two 1702FPs, a 2001FP, my father and son each have a Samsung 191T (same as Dell 1900FP). All have been problem free and none have any bad pixels. If you watch for sales, they are outstanding buys. (2001FP is back on sale at $750 including shipping on the Small Business site.)

Message Edited by talmy on 02-06-2004 01:12 PM

23 Posts

February 6th, 2004 19:00

Sure thing!  Let me know if you have any other questions.

142 Posts

February 7th, 2004 15:00

Thanks Talmy,

You seem to be quite a guy. I'm impressed. I appreciate the feed back on the LCD's . I think I'm going to take the " Leap ". I'm retired and on the computer for at least 6-8 hours a day and my eyes are not to good and I've been suffering with eye strain from the CRT. It seems to me that the LCD picture is easier on the eyes. I'm really not a gamer but who knows in the future. Do you think the LCD's that you recommend are fast enough for some gaming without shadows etc.

Jerry

1K Posts

February 7th, 2004 16:00

I don't use my computer for games. But the "word on the street" is that the 2001FP is great for games. The other monitors are slower.

575 Posts

February 7th, 2004 18:00

Like talmy, I have a 1702FP and I ordered a 2001FP last night. The 1702FP has great image quality and, with the very fast 16ms response time, the 2001FP is about as close as an LCD is gonna get to a CRT for gaming. I also have a friend with a 1901FP and it has great image quality. You really can't go wrong with any of these LCD's.

142 Posts

February 7th, 2004 19:00

Thanks Ortleeb,

I'm going for the 1901FP. They have a good deal at $611.00. That includes a 10% discount and free shipping. I think it will be fine for me. Big compared to the 17" crt I presently have. My playing of games is rare. My generation is not hand eye coordinated like you young people. I see that all the time with my grandchildren. My son is always having some problems with his games and is always tweaking something or another. But he has the patience and dedication.

Thank you for your help. You made my mind up.

And again thanks for everyones advice. I think Dell's community is great.

Jerry

575 Posts

February 7th, 2004 19:00

Excellent choice. My friend absolutely loves his. Have fun with it...if you can keep your son and grandchildren away from it.

1K Posts

February 7th, 2004 22:00

"High Resolution" doesn't mean tiny text. From Display Properties, go to Settings, press Advanced. The DPI setting can be increased which will make text bigger. My 84 year old parents use LCD monitors with no problems, and my mother has cataracts. But the fonts are enlarged using the Windows settings.

5 Posts

February 7th, 2004 22:00

I have read that LCD Monitors require high resolution,thereby creating more "real estate" and consequently smaller fonts.  As I am also retired and do not have the best  vision, I wonder if an LCD Monitor is the best choice?

 

Can ayone comment?

575 Posts

February 8th, 2004 00:00

The 1901FP that dedicated is getting has a native (default) resolution of 1280X1024 pixels. Even with the finer, higher native resolution of 1600X1200 pixels that the some LCD's have (like the 2001FP and some of the higher-end notebook monitors), the image quality is excellent and the text is clear and very readable. If you have a BestBuy or CompUSA near you, you can view LCD monitors of almost every native resolution and quality and you can judge for yourself.

1 Rookie

 • 

2.1K Posts

February 8th, 2004 06:00

i have the viewsonic vp171b , really like it. its not cheap, but quality cost.

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=24-116-276&catalog=20&manufactory=BROWSE&depa=0

dell sells this monitor too

viewsonic also has the new vp201-its 20.1 inch, 16ms speed, but very expensive-$1159.

planar has some 16ms monitors are suppose to be great, but costs a lot.

 

No Events found!

Top