Symmetrix
Posts
This post is more than 5 years old
Solved!
Go to Solution18 Posts
0
1204
September 3rd, 2009 06:00
STD vs BCV
Timefinder/clone target can be STD or BCV. What is the benefit of one over the other?
Responses(5)
No Events found!
This post is more than 5 years old
18 Posts
0
1204
Top
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
September 3rd, 2009 08:00
And possibly they are already in your box .. and this is a good way of using them
pr12282
14 Posts
1
September 3rd, 2009 06:00
xe2sdc
2.8K Posts
0
September 3rd, 2009 06:00
TF/Clone can clone data from any device to any deivce. The copy mechanism is always the same, regardless of SRC/TGT pair involved in process. BCV devices used with TF/Mirror (and without Clone Emulation) have a slightly different behaviour and we discussed about differences ages ago. Unfortunatly I can't easily find the thread. However the main difference is that with TF/Mirror you have to 1) establish the BCV to its corresponding STD device 2) wait 'till the BCV is synched 3) split the BCV and have your indepentent copy of STD data.
With TF/Clones you have a lot more options but you always have at least a few tracks waiting to be copied even after you "split" the target.
DonT2
18 Posts
0
September 3rd, 2009 07:00
DonT2
18 Posts
0
September 3rd, 2009 08:00