This post is more than 5 years old
10 Posts
0
2181
is fast a fit for general virtualization workloads?
Hi all,
Test setup
2 x esxi 4.1 hosts
cx4120
5x100gb efd/5x300gb fc/ 5x1tb sata - all in a storage pool with auto tiering enabled
2x100gb efd for fast cache
I have been doing some testing and reading on Fast. I see the benefits immediately.. hit a server with high io and sure enough blocks of data are moved up to flash drives and the io throughput increases from say 3000 io/s to 9000 with an 8kb block (50/50 read/write 50/50 random sequential) – and latency drops from 30ms to 2.9ms – all superb.
I do have some concerns though.
First, we will be backing up the infrastructure every night (exact solution still to be decided) that is a heck of a lot of i/o – I would think that the biggest servers (.vmdk files) would be generating the most i/o simply due to the size of them and the amount of time taken to transfer them to whatever medium we use for backups. Hence even if a server is very low in i/o requirement during the day if it has a large disk it will be moved up the tier due to the IO generated during the backup cycle, so we could have a small database that has a high i/o requirement that gets moved down the tier due to a big disk on a very underutilised server.
So I read a bit and found this. http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h8057-fast-sap-unified-storage-wp.pdf
And got all warm about fast again until I found this:- page 18
It’s the last last line that has me worried.. “totally different types of work” “during the day and night” – just what I had been thinking – we have a stupidly different environment, 100 vm’s with lots of different apps/databases etc. – then we will be generating lots of traffic at night backing it all up.
I suppose if you could configure fast with a time window when NOT to collect data results that would nail the day and night problemit.. but I can’t see that option.
I still don’t like the statement about “totally different types of work though”
The conclusion doesn’t read any better.
So the question is.. fast or no fast?
|
Rainer_EMC
8.6K Posts
0
October 11th, 2010 08:00
Hi,
I would suggest to talk to your local EMC technical specialist.
AFAIK we try to not promote slices if there is only read-once sequential I/O like backup.
Rainer