Unsolved
1 Message
0
43424
XPS 13 9310, battery drain issue
A week back, I have brought XPS 13 and received it a couple of days back. I have never achieved the battery life suggested on the Dell website for the laptop. I agree it varies by usage and setting preferences. My expected battery life is between 5-6 hours after a full charge with zero screen brightness, no Bluetooth device connected, no Netflix streaming, battery set to balance, and power mode as best battery. I have seen some comments after driver and BIOS updates, it should be better but even that has not helped to improve battery life. It gives me great disappointment with your premium device.
And once more small inconvenience faced by using the laptop while working in COMSOL. There is some graphic rendering problem and cannot see the output images. I have graphic rendering setting as my other Dell Latitude 5480 laptop which has core i3 7th gen processor.
I really love the performance and other features of the laptop and that is the reason for choosing it over other premium devices. Please provide a solution to overcome these.
The-peepta
14 Posts
0
December 18th, 2020 13:00
@DELL-Jesse L
How long can we expect the battery life to be with a 100% charge using this new bios?
notojacek
2 Posts
0
December 21st, 2020 02:00
Any news on this? I just received a 2-in-1 XPS 13 with a 4k screen but the battery life is not even bad, it's abysmal.
I changed the resolution to lower, brightness to 40%, changed to the adaptive battery in Dell Power, and to "Better Battery Life" in Windows 10. By only using MS Edge I can get a maximum of 2 hours and 30minutes of usage. I am losing 40% of the battery every 1hour of use. And yes, I have the new BIOS installed already (2.0.0).
I still can return it, and I will if this is what I can expect in general from this device.
notojacek
2 Posts
0
December 21st, 2020 04:00
I am surprised, especially that Lenovo and HP have much better battery life from what I have read on UHD/3K displays (even often bigger screens - 14inch). Two-three hours battery life is not something that any company should strive for in portable ultrabooks. Especially when the dell website says it's 7h+ on the battery, which is over two/three times higher than actual numbers.
Also - shouldn't the battery last longer when I lower the resolution? Which I did and it did extend my battery life to whooping 3 hours.
Even on their website, it claims "Experience incredibly long battery life — up to 14 hours on a Full HD+ model when streaming your favorite shows or up to 8 hours and 16 minutes of streaming on a 4K+ model." What I can't understand is how this ever got production with such poor performance (even on battery saving modes).
EDIT: I just saw that you mention this advertising as well - yes, this is a poor choice by Dell as it's clearly miles away from the real numbers. Also - I think there is BIOS 2.0.0 now - at least that what I have installed. No changes though as well to the battery life.
I am trying to return mine and buy HP, hopefully it will be better (and from what I have read - it is).
David_Dsi51
14 Posts
0
December 21st, 2020 04:00
@notojacek = the 4k display is known for draining significantly more battery than simple FHD+ (=reason why I went for FHD+). So I'm unfortunately not so surprised about your figures.. but also very disapointed with FHD+
On my FHD+ model, even after upgrading to latest BIOS 1.4.0, battery life does not seem to improve = remains about 5h with minimal brightness, bluetooth off and simply browsing the web over wifi. The only reply I had from DELL support was a private message saying = "We are terribly sorry for the confusion and this situation, unfortunately modern units could only last longer than 5 hours with minimum use of energy."
Just wondering why DELL keeps advertising up to 11h streaming withe FHD+ and 8h for 4k, on their website - we are all miles away from such battery life performance..
DELL web site - new XPS13
Alfmaster
1 Message
0
January 2nd, 2021 19:00
I don't work for Dell nor am I associate it with them. Just trying to help.
Search for command prompt, by hitting the windows key and type "cmd", DO NOT HIT ENTER.
Right click on the command prompt and select run as administrator
Now, type:
powercfg /sleepstudy /output "C:/sleep.html"
Go to your hard drive and locate the generated file at the root of your c drive, sleep.html.
Open it up and it should provide you some insights on that is going on.
It is also possible the 9310 only offers Modern Standby for Windows or Suspend to Idle for the Linux adventurers, power modes.
If that is the case, it means deep sleep is not supported by the firmware on this machine, hence it will slow drain while sleeping.
HTH!
DRFP
13 Posts
0
January 4th, 2021 14:00
Thinking of returning since my lenovo with a 10th gen is getting 8 hours
This is a big disappointment since Dell help just told me I can expect 2 hours of battery life with this laptop!
Its advertised as 12 hours. I just do not understand this
11th gen i5 EVO laptop
1920x1200 screen
all drivers and bios updated
6 hours 30 minutes of battery life
EVO states 8 hours
this is not fulfilling expectations
FlashKartoon
7 Posts
1
January 14th, 2021 02:00
Same problem with FHD display under Linux.
This is simply unacceptable.in a Laptop in this price segment.
Either this gets fixed or this will be my first and LAST Dell laptop.
Milldor
1 Message
1
January 16th, 2021 09:00
My battery life was awful at first. Normally averaging 4 hours ish with just browsing and word processing.
I ended up totally formatting the drive and installing Windows again.(If you do this remember to change the storage driver to AHCI or you will need a driver on installation).
I now get 9 hours average, sometimes Windows battery bar reports over 14 hours but I didn't expect that to last. It seems that some of the Dell drivers or software drain battery significantly. Modern sleep also drains battery when operating, there is a .reg file you can get to add an option to disable connectivity when sleeping in advanced power options.
eugene86
3 Posts
0
January 17th, 2021 05:00
I have Dell XPS 9310 (Ubuntu 20.04) with 1920x1080 non-touch display (Core i7) and also not satisfied with battery.
Battery discharges too fast when I use notebook for websites browsing.
If the laptop is on suspend during the night (12 hours) battery loses about 7% of charge. It is not normal!
Looks like it is a common Dell problem, because Latitude 7490 also drains such huge amount of charge during night suspend.
My old Macbook Pro 13 (early 2015) with i7 shows much better results.
I also have checked whether laptop loses battery charge if completely switched off -- no, that's fine. 100% remained after night.
And the most strange thing that when I purchased the laptop (it was in sealed package) its battery was fully empty 0%. Has anyone else experienced the same?
muxoll
5 Posts
0
January 17th, 2021 22:00
muxoll
5 Posts
0
January 17th, 2021 23:00
David_Dsi51
14 Posts
0
January 18th, 2021 00:00
@muxoll
Tks for sharing the article from techdows.com but the present issue obersved on XPS13-9310 is rather specific to DELL machines (unfortunately), while similar machines from competitors achieve much better battery life. The chromium-based Edge browser possibly does not help, but is not the source of the issue here.
You would observe same limited battery life with simply running word.. or other web browser.
Was also hoping the new BIOS update would help, sounds like it is not..
muxoll
5 Posts
0
January 18th, 2021 03:00
muxoll
5 Posts
1
January 18th, 2021 05:00
FlashKartoon
7 Posts
1
January 21st, 2021 13:00
** Update to my previous post **
As everyone here I was having the same low battery life, in my case running Ubuntu 20.10 with kernel 5.8. (4-5 hours max, around 2,5 while working)
Last weekend I noticed that Ubuntu 20.04 has a kernel 5.10 backport available and decided to give it a try, to see if I could finally use my until now unsuported Killer AX500 WiFi adapter.
Et voila!! Not only the WiFi adapter got recognized but the battery holds what it promised.
I get a full day of work without problem.
It seems that in my case, it was just some software issue solved with kernel update.