High Overview: I have a file system for user Home Directories. Apparently, there has been some "slowness" during Logoffs. Roaming profiles are used with our users. I just migrated from Physical Servers to the Celerra. I didn't think it was Celerra related until I opened Celerra Monitor and noticed that starting at 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. The File System is "Hit" with about 1200 - 2000 IOPS. Which makes sense since the user community (800 Users) are logging off and Roaming Profiles are synchronizing.
I noticed the File System was created from 3 volumes within 2 Raid Groups (Raid 5 4+1). The Raid Groups are composed of 600 GB 10K Luns. Hence, both Raid Groups combined will offer about 1200 IOPS.
I want to perform the following:
I will create a Storage Pool composed of (3) Raid 5 (4+1) Groups. The hard drives are going to be 300GB 15K FC Drives (180*15 = 2700 IOPS).
The Current File System is mounted under a VDM. I will replicate to a new File System composed from the NEW Storage Pool (Which will be dedicated to HOME directories ONLY). Mount it under the same VDM.
Once Synchronized:
#1 Is it as easy as hitting the failover Button?
#2 Will I have to recreate all user shares?
#3 Will it automatically use the interface assigned to the CIFS server that is mounted under the VDM?
I will test but just wanted to get some general feedback.
Yes. Simply create a loopback replication between your original fs and the new one, then switchover the replication session.
#2 Will I have to recreate all user shares?
No. You can unmount the original fs from it's mountpoint, then mount the new one on the original mountpoint.
Example :
# server_umount VDM -p fs01
# server_mount VDM fs01_new /fs01
You will notice a 1-2 minutes downtime, or even less.
Since the shares are based on the mountpoint, and not the file system name, you don't need to recreate your shares.
#3 Will it automatically use the interface assigned to the CIFS server that is mounted under the VDM?
Yes. You don't need to worry about it.
Obs.: if you want the best file system layout in your case would be to use 4 X R5 4+1, then stripe your FS across these 20 spindles. This is what AVM tries to do when there are available disks. This also will give you a future grow room.
as always I would suggest to create a test VDM / CIFS and two test fs to try this and figure out the best order of commands before doing it on production data
Original config; I did create (4) Raid 5 4+1 Raid Groups out of 600 GB 10K Drives. Hence, I was using 20 drives. However, when I look in Celerra Monitor under Configuration Status, I see two slices existing on two different Raid Groups???
gbarretoxx1
2 Intern
•
366 Posts
656
0
Posted October 22nd, 2010 10:00
Hi,
#1 Is it as easy as hitting the failover Button?
Yes. Simply create a loopback replication between your original fs and the new one, then switchover the replication session.
#2 Will I have to recreate all user shares?
No. You can unmount the original fs from it's mountpoint, then mount the new one on the original mountpoint.
Example :
# server_umount VDM -p fs01
# server_mount VDM fs01_new /fs01
You will notice a 1-2 minutes downtime, or even less.
Since the shares are based on the mountpoint, and not the file system name, you don't need to recreate your shares.
#3 Will it automatically use the interface assigned to the CIFS server that is mounted under the VDM?
Yes. You don't need to worry about it.
Obs.: if you want the best file system layout in your case would be to use 4 X R5 4+1, then stripe your FS across these 20 spindles. This is what AVM tries to do when there are available disks. This also will give you a future grow room.
Gustavo Barreto.