This post is more than 5 years old
25 Posts
0
1803
July 7th, 2008 14:00
Raid Group Expansion
I need to expand a 5 disk (146GB) Raid 5 (4 x 1) set adding one disk. The questions are:
1. Will the current LUN be acessible to the host during the Raid Group expansion?
2. Can I use diskpart to expand the LUN on the host, using concatonation to allow the host immediate access to the increased size.
Host Info: 2 Windows Servers 2003 in a clustered environment.
I usually would create another raid Group and LUN then create a MetaLun, but I only need 133GB of additional space and I don't have anymore disks.
All LUNs are on a CX3-80 running Flare 3.26
Thanks,
Bing
1. Will the current LUN be acessible to the host during the Raid Group expansion?
2. Can I use diskpart to expand the LUN on the host, using concatonation to allow the host immediate access to the increased size.
Host Info: 2 Windows Servers 2003 in a clustered environment.
I usually would create another raid Group and LUN then create a MetaLun, but I only need 133GB of additional space and I don't have anymore disks.
All LUNs are on a CX3-80 running Flare 3.26
Thanks,
Bing
No Events found!


AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
July 7th, 2008 14:00
during the Raid Group expansion?
Yes, the existing LUN will be restriped across the disks in the RAID Group.
using concatonation to allow the host immediate
access to the increased size.
I believe you will have to wait until the restriping is complete before the additional space is available. There used to be an option to expand the LUN with the RAID Group if the existing LUN used occupied the entire RAID Group but the option is not available if you have metaLUNs.
So you will need to create a new LUN and concatenate it to the existing LUN.
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
July 7th, 2008 16:00
using concatonation to allow the host immediate
access to the increased size.
Host Info: 2 Windows Servers 2003 in a clustered
environment.
yes you can ..there are a few caveats you need to know dealing with expanding storage on ms clusters ...Aran is our cluster-master ...he can elaborate more on that
calle2
133 Posts
1
July 8th, 2008 01:00
I would furthermore then do a fail-over to the second node to confirm that it accepts the new disk size but no expansion should be required.
As in all cases a backup prior to commencing the diskpart procedure would be highly recommended.
ovivier
142 Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 01:00
In MSCS environment, if you are not running a volume manager like Veritas Storage Foundation, you are using basic disks and you can use diskpart to expand the LUN:
1) Increase the LUN on the CX3-80
2) Expand the partition with diskpart on the active node
3) No expansion to be done on the passive node
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 01:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 02:00
In a cluster I can imagine that if the 2nd node is still seeing the LUN while it's being expanded by the 1st node he could get confused....
ovivier
142 Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 02:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 02:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 02:00
About having the cluster resource taken offline, I'm not sure. But expanding on 1 node is enough, the other node will work just fine when the other node did the expansion.
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
July 8th, 2008 04:00
the cluster resource must be taken offline as well as
the standby node. Then enlarge the LUN and bring
everything up again.
yep ..like calle said ..if you take disk resource offline in cluster, you will not be able to see it in Disk Management ..and diskpart will not be able to expand it either. The only issue i've see is where diskpart does its job on active node but when your fail the resource over to the standby node ..it does not see the new space until after it's rebooted.
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 05:00
That's what I meant. I think we meant the same thing but didn't say it right. So the 2nd node needs a reboot anyway: in that case you can shut it down (node = down, so offline), do the expansion and bring the 2nd node up again. We meant exactly the same thing.
AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 07:00
AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 07:00
offline, but cannot fint the document anymore. It
might have been a Microsoft document... I don't
remember.
That might have been for an older rev of the OS? I have tested this in Windows Server 2003 clusters under i/o load and it worked very well.
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
July 8th, 2008 07:00
SanMan5
25 Posts
0
July 8th, 2008 07:00
Thanks Again,
Bing