Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
111 Posts
0
702
December 29th, 2007 15:00
SATA II LUN Distribution between SPs in same RAID Group
With the older SATA drives, they were not dual ported so you had to place all LUNs from the same RAID Group on the same SP.
Is that still the case with the new DAE3P/DAE4Ps and SATA II Drives. If you look at the
EMC CLARiiON DAE2P and DAE3P Disk-Array Enclosures HARDWARE REFERENCE
page 1-10
It mentions that the SATA II drives are dual ported.
Can anyone show me a reference that specifically spells out that SATA II can or can not have its LUNs on the same RAID Group on different SPs...
Thanks for your help
Chris
Is that still the case with the new DAE3P/DAE4Ps and SATA II Drives. If you look at the
EMC CLARiiON DAE2P and DAE3P Disk-Array Enclosures HARDWARE REFERENCE
page 1-10
It mentions that the SATA II drives are dual ported.
Can anyone show me a reference that specifically spells out that SATA II can or can not have its LUNs on the same RAID Group on different SPs...
Thanks for your help
Chris
No Events found!


DGM3
238 Posts
0
December 29th, 2007 22:00
spells out that SATA II can or can not have its LUNs
on the same RAID Group on different SPs...
chrisp,
The guidance for assigning the LUNs within a certain RAID Group to a single SP is applicable to the 2Gbit/sec DAE-ATA implementation (usually found on CX-series arrays). It does not carry over to the 4Gbit/sec DAE3P/DAE4P implementation that was introduced on CX3-series arrays. Essentially - go by the enclosure type. This is reflected in the "EMC CLARiiON Best Practices Guide for Fibre Channel Storage" document (available on Powerlink) page 34 in the latest edition, although the wording there currently highlights the array type.
Regards,
DGM
chrisp3
111 Posts
0
December 30th, 2007 07:00
The way you explained it was the way I understood it. Once you get on the DAE3P/DAE4P, you can ignore the old requirements about LUN to SP in same RG for ATA Drives (SATA II).
The article that made me question that was
emc157746
It shows the environments that are affected as CX and CX3 Series. I think it reads that way is because you can support the older DAE2P-ATA models in the newer CX3 Series.
Reference emc154373
Essentially, if you have a CX3 Series with the older DAE2P-ATAs (2Gbps) you still need to comply with all LUNs in the same RG to same SP requirements. If you have a CX3 with the Newer DAE3P/DAE4P (3/4 Gbps) you can distribute the LUNs in the same RG to different SPs without a performance issue.
Do you agree with this conclusion?
If so EMC should be more specific and reference the DAE model for this requirement instead on the CX Series.
Thanks again for your time and input.
DGM3
238 Posts
0
December 30th, 2007 10:00
Regards,
DGM
chrisp3
111 Posts
0
December 31st, 2007 15:00
It would be appreciated if EMC can produce a clearer definition on this.