Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Posts
0
1418
November 2nd, 2006 19:00
shared storage not updating on all nodes
Hi,
I hope this is an easy on since I am new to EMC.
I have three Linux nodes each has the naviagentcli installed and the agent.config file is below. I have created a storage group and assigned a LUN and the three nodes to the storage group. Each node can mount the presented LUN. The problem is that each node operates as if in a vacuum. If node A copies or removes a file, none of the other nodes will see that unless I remount the volume.
Not sure what the problem is and I can not seem to find the right doc that talks about this. If you could please point me to the right doc or tell me what I am doing wrong, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
###########################
# Navisphere agent.config
###########################
clarDescr Navisphere Agent
clarContact
device auto auto
#user root # only on this machine
user root@lcm1ddb04
user root@lcm1ddb05
user root@lcm1ddb06
poll 60
eventlog 100
baud 9600
I hope this is an easy on since I am new to EMC.
I have three Linux nodes each has the naviagentcli installed and the agent.config file is below. I have created a storage group and assigned a LUN and the three nodes to the storage group. Each node can mount the presented LUN. The problem is that each node operates as if in a vacuum. If node A copies or removes a file, none of the other nodes will see that unless I remount the volume.
Not sure what the problem is and I can not seem to find the right doc that talks about this. If you could please point me to the right doc or tell me what I am doing wrong, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
###########################
# Navisphere agent.config
###########################
clarDescr Navisphere Agent
clarContact
device auto auto
#user root # only on this machine
user root@lcm1ddb04
user root@lcm1ddb05
user root@lcm1ddb06
poll 60
eventlog 100
baud 9600
No Events found!


Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
November 3rd, 2006 01:00
With a CLARiiON, you should not have multiple hosts connected to the same LUN unless they are running Cluster software... or some other method of arbitrating file system access (e.g. multiple VM ESX servers).
Outside of those special situations, you should always maintain a 1-to-1 mapping of hosts to Storage Groups.
If you ARE running a cluster, you may have to check the configuration of your cluster to determine the problem.
If my first guess was correct, maybe if you explain in more detail what you are trying to achieve, we can come up with another solution that will meet your needs.
ruroruro
5 Posts
0
November 3rd, 2006 04:00
All 3 server cannot see all LUNs that you attached.
If you wanna use those LUNs, you should make 1 storage group per server.
That means if server A has LUN A, other B, C servers cannot see LUN A.
boogie1
2 Posts
0
November 3rd, 2006 07:00
Thanks,
csmykay1
59 Posts
0
November 3rd, 2006 21:00
Linux:
You can add multiple nodes to the same SG (No Problem), but do not "need" clustering software.
All nodes can "see" the disk just fine. However you can not (nor should you even try, trust me I have
Windows:
You can add multiple nodes to the same SG (No Problem), but you DO "need" clustering software.
The way that the Windows disk sub-system handles a disk at the SCSI layer will cause all nodes to "Fight" over the disks.
I just wanted to clarify what you can actually do from a Storage Group perspective.
Regards,
Shmac
USShivas
8 Posts
0
November 6th, 2006 10:00
Are you using nis on Linux ? If you are using nis update the nis map and push the map. So that you can see the luns on every host.
Hope this will be useful.
Thanks & Regards,
USshivas