We just got a new DD160 and are starting to integrate it into our backup infrastructure. We have a very typical setup - about 40 virtualized windows servers, mostly file servers, SQL servers, exchange, print server, domain controllers, etc. We use Storage Craft Shadow Copy for our front end backup client. I configured the backup jobs to disable compression on the client side and pointed them to the DD160. We are over 50% utilization on capacity and still copying our data over, but only seeing about 2.3x compression / de-dupe. Is this normal? We were led to expect at least 10x space savings. I would have thought multiple backups of the same server OS would give better de-dupe results than this, and the data / user files would compress much more than 2x. What are we missing?
I'm doing full, uncompressed backups (I didn't copy over any archived backups, so I had nothing to do a differential/incremental with), and am using the default 'lz' compression on the DD160.
One thing which might influence de-dupe ratio is of course encoding of the stream, but I doubt this is the case. I can only assume that data copied so far was unique for some reason and if you say data didn't change, then stream format is such that is not very de-dupe friendly. I happen to have one DD160 and backup is pretty much the same as you describe, but I get obviously better numbers:
I am a Data Domain TSE. Could you email the serial number of the affected system so that I can look at the latest AutoSupports? My email address is patrick.betts@emc.com. I'll take a look and see if I can figure out what's going on.
As I said, these are our initial copies of data, so there are no multiples of full backups to de-dupe, but I would think typical end-user data, databases and email would compress and de-dupe better than 2x, as would multiple installs of the same OS files.
I assume your DD160 is showing the results from ongoing weekly full backups?
I'm trying to. Initially there was an issue with sending me attachments but we got it working. I'm going over the data now. If chappel02 allows, I'll post my findings (or chappel02 can).
ble1
6 Operator
•
14354 Posts
•
56186 Points
4627
0
Posted April 11th, 2014 09:00
Which compression do you use on DD? Do you backup fulls or incrementals or...?