Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

C

50097

January 30th, 2010 02:00

Need advice on graphics cards...

I want to ask for advice concerning graphics cards, but more specifically how large a graphics card (vram capacitywise) my current PC can accommidate. The computer, a Dimension E510 currently has a 256MB graphics card. When I originally configured this system back in 2005, 256MB was the largest avaliable for it and was probably also the largest avaliable on the consumer level. I am now seeing 512MB and 1GB graphics cards on store shelves.

I am a big flight sim enthusiast, and while this PC still meets the system requirements of the sim I use, graphics wise it's starting to reach the lowest edge of the minimum system requirements. I may want or even need to upgrade the graphics card eventually. Anyone know if the Dimension E510's system board can accomidate a 512MB or larger graphics card?

381 Posts

January 30th, 2010 06:00

The hottest card that I think can fit into an E510 is the Gigabyte GV-N250OC-1GI.  Nvidia GTS250 with 1 GB video memory.  It just fits.  You will want an updated PSU in the 500W range.  This is the card that I put in to my E510.  It gets a respectable 660 on the video benchmark listed in this forum.

David

1 Rookie

 • 

126 Posts

January 30th, 2010 08:00

The PSU... is that the PC's power supply that your reffering too? I don't mind replacing the system's power supply if it's current one can't power a more powerful graphics card without getting overloaded. However, since that might cost extra, I will need to research the issue in more detail before I make any choices. Would the current power supply's wattage be indicated anywhere on it, in a spot that would be visible?

270 Posts

January 30th, 2010 09:00

I wasn't familiar with the e510's specs so i looked them up at Dell ... e510 specs page

your system has a 305watt power supply and one pcie 16 graphic slot ....

with that set up about the best card your could get without changing the power supply is an ATI 4670

saphire HD 4670

food for thought: the spec page said your pc is running the old Pentium 4 CPU ... that is a very slow CPU even by today's lower end celeron standards ... it is not worth replacing your power supply and adding a mega zippy modern video card ... that CPU will bottleneck the experience.  I would pull a modern system out of the dell outlet center before buying a new power supply and graphic card for the old pentium 4 system.

1 Rookie

 • 

126 Posts

January 30th, 2010 11:00

Configuring and buying a new PC is pretty much out of the question right now. I am disabled and unemployed, rellying on disability benefits for my income. Back in '05 when I configured this current PC, I was in much better financial shape. Right now in this economy, there would be no way for me to afford a new PC. My disability benifits barely cover my basic living expenses and don't leave much room for extras.

Right now, my best option financewise would be to see how much this PC can be upgraded before I begin conscidering buying a new one.

1 Rookie

 • 

126 Posts

January 30th, 2010 13:00

Thanks for all the info everyone. I've got a lot of research to do and I'll keep the issue of the card's physical size and the power supply wattage requirement in mind when I am ready to start shopping for a more powerful graphics card. There is a Geeksquad service center at my local Best Buy, I think I'll take the PC to them and have them help me choose a suitable graphics card when I am ready.

381 Posts

January 30th, 2010 13:00

The 305W supply does not directly support PCI Express.  I put in a 520W OCZ supply which worked great with the Gigabyte video card.  The GTS520 is the same as the 9800GTX+ and really zips along.  I have this machine set up for folding and it does 6000 ppd.  A good 500W PSU is around $50 - $60.  The overclocked GTS200 from Gigabyte is $130 after rebate this month.  I have my e510 also set up with 3 GB RAM and it is quite a nice performer.  I am sure that I will get several more years out of it before switching to a new machine.  By then, today's machines will be starting to become obsolete, so I can end up saving a lot of money by delaying a few years.

BTW, not all GTS250s will fit.  I have measured and got the Gigabyte because it is within 1/8" of the CPU fan shroud.  These BTX cases are a little tough to get a video card fit.

The zalman fan on the GTS250 is a work of art in itself.

The 4670 is a fine lower power video card.  It benches around 1/4 of a GTS250.  But the extra cost of the GTS250 will extend the enjoyable life of your system.  And you could always move the GTS250 into a future machine.

David

90 Posts

January 30th, 2010 23:00

Which video card do you have now?  I sort of agree with the other posters that the Radeon HD4670 512 mb card would be an excellent upgrade for your current system.  It also would be the most economical since it will run fine with your existing power supply.  Also it would not be as severely bottlenecked by your current CPU.  You can darn near buy a new 4670 for what an appropriate power supply to run a 250GTS.  I think I paid about $65 after rebate for mine.  If you feel you need a bang for the buck upgrade to enhance your machine's 3D gaming ability, you really should take a good look at the Radeon HD4670.

381 Posts

January 31st, 2010 07:00

It's a question of bang for the buck short term or long term.  With a GTS250, one might not want to upgrade the computer for several years.  If you have had a chance to run a current game on a 4670 class card versus a GTS250 you would see the enormous difference.  The GTS250 would feel like a new PC instead of just an upgrade.  Now, the 4870 is a different story.  It is more in the GTS250 class.  But it is a bit more expensive and doesn't fit into an E510.

David

90 Posts

January 31st, 2010 11:00

"Configuring and buying a new PC is pretty much out of the question right now. I am disabled and unemployed, rellying on disability benefits for my income. Back in '05 when I configured this current PC, I was in much better financial shape. Right now in this economy, there would be no way for me to afford a new PC. My disability benifits barely cover my basic living expenses and don't leave much room for extras.

Right now, my best option financewise would be to see how much this PC can be upgraded before I begin conscidering buying a new one."

Lambda, I realize there are better more powerful cards available, but given the original poster's quote above, I suggested what I feel is the most cost effective upgrade that may be within his means.  I sort of think of if as my "theory of relativity".  The HD4670 provides unbelievable performance, relative to onboard graphics, or compared to a Nvidia 9300GE.  Obviously, it can't compete with a 4870 or a GTS250, but then it is less than half the cost of either.  I recently upgraded to a 5750 for my system, as well as a 460W power supply.  Could I have afforded more?  Probably, but I am not that big of a gamer, and I am trying to keep 4 different systems viable for light to medium gaming for my 2 boys at home, their buddy and my wife.  (I frequently use her system for games when the kids are hogging the other systems.  Stupid Steam.)  So I am a strictly bang for the buck kind of guy, and take great satisfaction in accomplishing my goals with the minimum investment.  Tha is also why I was curious as to his current video card.  If it is an older more powerful card, like an 8800GT, then the HD4670 would not represent a good value upgrade.  It is all relative to what he has, and what he can afford.  If he comes back and enlightens us, then we can make more appropriate recommendations.  And I still say any newer more powerful video card would probably be bottlenecked by his older Pentium 4 CPU, older motherboard and ram, not to mention the need for a new stronger power supply.  Which doesn't sound like a viable plan for the original poster.

 

1 Rookie

 • 

126 Posts

January 31st, 2010 13:00

The PC's current graphics card is an ATI Radeon X600. It's original equipment, that is this was the card I chose when I configured and ordered this PC Back in 2005. The system's processor according to the hardware manager is a 3.40 GHz Pentium 4. There are two entries listed for the processor, so I am guessing that the PC has a dual-core processor.

381 Posts

January 31st, 2010 14:00

It could also be a P4 HyperThread.  Either way, the 3.4 is no slouch.  The nice thing about the X600 is that it supports two monitors and can go to 1920x1200 (a little higher VGA).  It is just not a gaming card.  The first upgrade I did on an E510 was to a 6600GT.  I then upgraded to a 7900GT within the year.  The 6600GT at the time was $200 and the 7900GT was $300.  When I did the 7900GT, I also upgraded the PSU to a 520.  The point is that I spent the $200 on the 6600GT when I should have gone straight to the 7800GT immediately.  What I learned from this was to go to the 256 bit GPUs and get as fast a GPU as I could reasonably.  Realize that with $200 1000W PSUs and $600 dual GPU GTX295s, $800 total, that a total of $200 for a 500W PSU and a 1 GB GTS250 is not an unrealistic amount of money.  And the point is that it buys time.  With that GPU, you will not need to upgrade for years.

David

90 Posts

January 31st, 2010 15:00

My point, David, is that the original poster probably doesn't have the funds available at this time for a $140 power supply and a $150 video card.  The HD4670 like this one

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125277  runs about $72 after rebate, and would be a nice upgrade for gaming up to about 1440x900 resolution, without the need for a power supply upgrade.  Is it optimal?  No.  Will it run Crysis on high at 1920x1080? No, and definitely not with his current system.  But, the 4670 will give him a huge upgrade, performance wise.  And I am confident it will be compatible with the rest of his system.

Here is a comparison of his current card with the 4670:

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=88&card2=579

Another more modern and slightly more expensive option would be one of the new Radeon 5670 cards, like this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102871

For $90 shipped, it is a bargain and even supports direct X 11.

Here is the comparison of the 5670 vs the 4670:

It provides almost double the memory bandwidth with almost identical peak power draw.  Sounds like a great bargain card, the only concern I have about it is that it could have some compatability issues with the original poster's older system.  But if he is at all adventurous, it might be worth the risk, as it should significantly outperform the 4670.  But even the 4670 totally destroys the X600.  That would be his choice.

Chuck

45 Posts

January 31st, 2010 15:00

I did replace a 256MB video card that came with my Dell E510 2 years ago by a GeForce NVIDIA 7300LE (512 MB) one. It worked fine; but 3 months ago I upgraded my Adobe to Ps  CS4 Extended with Bridge and Lightrom 2; this 512Mb looks slow down my workflows a little bit. Therefore; I searched and finally bought (at newegg.com) a 1TB GeForce NVIDIA 9500GT that works great. So far so good. My E510 came with a 305W PS and this PSU works fine. however I have a 400W one for spare; in case i need it. To me, if you install a card that needs a seperate source of power / comes with its own power terminals or cable, then you have to upgrade PSU to a higher wattage unit, otherwise no need to upgrade the PSU (It'll power from PCI-e 16). Hopefully this message helps.

Good luck.

T. Le

1 Rookie

 • 

126 Posts

January 31st, 2010 16:00

I am not planning to upgrade the graphics card right now, I plan to upgrade this PC a little bit at a time. This month I have enough space in my finances to cover a few upgrades, maybe a few more next month, and then maybe a few more in April.

For now, I need to upgrade the PC's hard drive. The current hard drive is a 160 GB that's been formatted as two partitions. The larger of the two has about 65 GB of free space avaliable on it at the most. The flight sim I am into requires atleast 70 to 72 GB of hard drive space just by itself! I'm going to replace it with a 320 GB hard drive and also replace both of the system's optical drives. The first optical drive (the upper one) is a very old DVD-ROM/CD-RW combo drive and it has taken a lot of wear-n-tear and has lost the ability to read DVD media altogether. The lower optical drive is a single layer DVD burner, it feels outdated and I plan to replace it with a new Dual Layer DVD burner.

90 Posts

January 31st, 2010 19:00

I recently installed a Western Digital Caviar Blue 500 GB drive in my Dell Vostro.  It seems faster than the original Seagate 250 GB drive.  Easy install and Acronius software available from the WD website made cloning my existing drive to the new drive very painless.  I picked mine up at Staples.com for $59.95.  FYI, even though it was a retail boxed drive, it did not include a SATA cable, so you will need to pick up an extra SATA cable if you are planning on adding an additional hard drive to your system, or if you want to clone your existing drive onto the new one.  (I recommend cloning your old drive to the new one.  Usually the newer drives are faster than the older drives)  Unless of course, you want to do a clean install of windows, in which case you will have to install all your old programs and files after you reinstall your operating system.

No Events found!

Top