UNSOLVED

Kaizen10

updated

19 years ago

K

Kaizen10

22 Posts

0

1187

January 17th, 2008 14:00

Multiple paths to DMX

Guys,

We have DMX and associated SAN and have 2 paths from the host to storage thru switch and zoned & masked seperately in backend.

Like to add two additional paths.

1) Is it possible to map metas to two additional FA directors?

2) After connecting two host HBAs to the switch and zoning & adding wwn to the LUN masking DB (to the existing FA dirs), would it work?

3) Which one will provide better performance and recommended? 1 or 2?

Thanks in advance.

Kaizen.
  • xe2sdc

    6 Operator

    2831 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted January 17th, 2008 15:00

    1) Is it possible to map metas to two additional FA directors?


    You can map metas (and generally speaking, any volume) on every port if you want. There are limits (number of devices mapped on a processor, number of luns mapped on a port) but generally speaking you can -if you want- map all the volumes on all the ports.

    2) After connecting two host HBAs to the switch and
    zoning & adding wwn to the LUN masking DB (to the
    existing FA dirs), would it work?


    I don't see too many alternatives ;-) .. You need to map the volume on the FAs, zone the host (the HBAs) with the FAs, mask the volumes to the HBAs and discover the devices from the host point of view.

    3) Which one will provide better performance and
    recommended? 1 or 2?


    I think that steps 1 and 2 are not mutually exclusive. You can choose to either increase the connectivity from the host perspective (add more HBA to an already existing host) or expand the connectivity from the storage perspective (map the volume to additional FA) .. Or you can simply choose to apply BOTH of them :D

    If you add more HBA or add more FA, you have however to zone the new paths and mask the devices you want to see.

    Increasing host connectivity is usually needed only if you find that your HBA are too busy. Usually you have to increase storage connectivity (add more FA) since this gives more "queues" where to queue your IO operations. But it's a very complex chapter so please don't take my few words as a suggestion :-)

    As I usually say when I talk about performances .. IT DEPENDS !! :-)

    Message was edited by:
    Stefano Del Corno
  • Kaizen10

    22 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted January 17th, 2008 15:00

    Stefano,

    You are doing wonderful work in this forum. Thank you.

    I got the pointers what I wanted and will move forward.

    Kaizen
  • xe2sdc

    6 Operator

    2831 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted January 18th, 2008 00:00

    You are doing wonderful work in this forum.


    Kaizen plese don't tell my manager I spend that much time on the forums :D
    He may fire me :-)

    Cheers !!

    -s-

    PS it's a pleasure for me to share the things I've learned while working for EMC.
  • dynamox

    11 Legend

    20419 Posts

    87439 Points

    290

    0

    Posted January 18th, 2008 03:00


    Kaizen plese don't tell my manager I spend that much
    time on the forums :D
    He may fire me :-)


    hahahah ..i have same concerns, i am sure when my manager gets monthly web usage reports he sees forums_emc_com at the very top. :)
  • xe2sdc

    6 Operator

    2831 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted January 18th, 2008 04:00

    Unfortunatly my manager never receive similar reports .. Since I'm always at customer site :D
  • xe2sdc

    6 Operator

    2831 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted February 18th, 2008 02:00

    Kaizen10 if you have more questions or doubts, please update this thread .. We'll be glad to help you further .. If you ask :D
  • RRR

    6 Operator

    5739 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted February 18th, 2008 13:00

    Talking about multiple paths to a DMX made me think about my speed record of copying data between 2 DMXs: I mapped 40 single symdevs and metas to as much as 14 FAs and copied 2TB withing the hour to the other DMX..... :) :)

    Top speed 835MBps, average speed about 515MBps.
  • xe2sdc

    6 Operator

    2831 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted February 18th, 2008 23:00

    14FA ?? You have a lot of unused stuff in your boxes !! ;-) ..

    Can you send some FA over the Alps ?? We always need some spare FA ... ;-)

    Cheers !!
  • RRR

    6 Operator

    5739 Posts

    290

    0

    Posted February 19th, 2008 00:00

    Who said anything about unused ? All the mentioned ports used to be in use by hosts (through switches of course).
    It all happened in a Open Replicator migration from an old DMX2 to a new DMX3.
    The DMX2 was nearly empty and only 3 servers were still attached. 2 Windows and 1 Sun. The Sun still had 40 lun's and the 2 Windows machines shared the same FAs. So all the other ports were already emptied and we had 14 ports (2 times 7) attached to the SAN. Only 14... that's not much ! Only FAx0 ports, not a single FAx1 port !
  • RRR

    6 Operator

    5739 Posts

    109

    0

    Posted February 19th, 2008 02:00

    The DMX2 is already gone ;) EMC took it back in october 2006. I think it's now a fish tank in Cork or something....