for smb i would rather use a dfs-structure for Failover since I only have to failover the syncIQ policy and do nothing else (this is also supported by superna).
this construct could work and you can also integrate "custom-scripts" to automate the DNS changes in superna. afaik the construct above is unsupported from superna.
since i have enough IPs i don't have to use such constructs so i can't talk from practice.
sluetze
2 Intern
•
300 Posts
1
June 19th, 2017 05:00
for smb i would rather use a dfs-structure for Failover since I only have to failover the syncIQ policy and do nothing else (this is also supported by superna).
this construct could work and you can also integrate "custom-scripts" to automate the DNS changes in superna. afaik the construct above is unsupported from superna.
since i have enough IPs i don't have to use such constructs so i can't talk from practice.