Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
1015
Sql Fast Track Warehouse Solution for Sql 2012
Hi All
Do we have a solution for Sql FastTrack for Data Warehousing using Sql 2012?
Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
1015
Hi All
Do we have a solution for Sql FastTrack for Data Warehousing using Sql 2012?
Top
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
June 21st, 2012 07:00
I have gone through that document… it is based on Sql 2008 R2.
We have a client looking at this & wants DR etc. So being able to position using Sql 2012 would differentiate us significantly.
Kind Regards
Tony Bosman
Mid-Tier Organisation (MTO) Specialist Technical Consultant
EMC South Africa
CONTACT DETAILS:
Switchboard: +27 21 917 4540
Mobile: +27 82 828-7500
Postal Address: PO Box 5351, Tygervalley, 7536
Physical Address: Avanti Building, Cnr Carl Cronje & Bill Bezuidenhout Road, Tygervalley, Bellville, Cape Town 7530
1 Attachment
image001.jpg
duckew
126 Posts
0
June 21st, 2012 07:00
Tony,
I found this on the ECN site
https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-11478
also you can always look at the SQL solution page located here
https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-11345
Regards
Bill
Tx1_f906d5
21 Posts
0
June 21st, 2012 11:00
We do have solutions that we have completed for SQL Server 2012 DW Fast Track, the documents supporting this are in review at this time, and are planned to be posted shortly.
You are probably familiar with the fact that these solutions are very prescriptive, and do detail the server, storage and interconnect. The existing solutions provide the base configuration, and at this time do not include validation of a D/R configuration. As a result, my question is in response to your comment regarding " & wants DR etc". Are you indicating that they want this within the storage architecture, e.g. RecoverPoint? Or are you saying that they want to do something like Availability Groups? I'm a little confused because you asked about SQL 2012, but then inferred that SQL 2012 was a part of the D/R. Well at least that is the way it could be read.
Tx