UNSOLVED

Thierry101

updated

14 years ago

T

Thierry101

2 Intern

326 Posts

0

3520

August 2nd, 2012 22:00

Auth. session limit

Hi all

Seeing this in daemon since last night...any idea what is this? Looks like its complaining about sessions more than 10 in that device which is set min 10 and max 60 on write device and 1 to 10 for read only device..

Auth. session limit greater than 10 for mmd# 4 on device rd=SN:DDB_dev15/_AF_readonly.

Thanks

  • 1109

    1

    Posted August 2nd, 2012 22:00

    Hi,

    Please take a look of this link where similar issue is been reported

    https://community.emc.com/thread/116265

    Thanks

    Shivakiran

  • Thierry101

    2 Intern

    326 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted August 5th, 2012 17:00

    Hi Shivakiran

    Thanks...have checked that out but different issue

  • lapfrank1234

    1 Rookie

    23 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted August 29th, 2012 14:00

    Hi Thierry,

    I've been noticing this same error since yesterday night.

    nsrd Auth. session limit greater than 32 for mmd# 1 on device dd_backleg_lsu1/_AF_readonly.

    I set the target and max session to 10 and 32 on both the readonly and the rw devices.

    Thierry, you ever found out what was causing this ?

    Anyone else has any idea ?

    Thanks!

    Francois

  • AnkitMehta

    4 Apprentice

    1365 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted August 29th, 2012 15:00

    Restart nsr daemon. Check if the error still persists.

  • Thierry101

    2 Intern

    326 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 13:00

    nope..still same and seeing it

  • ble1

    6 Operator

    14354 Posts

    56186 Points

    1109

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 14:00

    We have noticed it during cloning when you get single session reads, but perhaps when multiple reads are going we get the same - I never paid attention to that.  I do not think we are in the same bus because we started using DD with SP4 which supports multiple reads (tested) for DD dev type devices and during those tests no issue has been seen.

  • lapfrank1234

    1 Rookie

    23 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 14:00

    I'm surprised to read that multiple reads are working in SP4+. I'm running SP5 and it still won't allow more than 1 read.

    If a clone is running on a DD device and then I launch a recover from the same DD, it will still say "busy" until the clone is killed off or finishes. Oh and it will also throw those "auth session limit greater than ..".

  • lapfrank1234

    1 Rookie

    23 Posts

    625

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 14:00

    ^ Interesting. I have the same setup as you. I wish it worked.

    As for DD Boost DFA, it only works with specific modules like NMDA or NMO, from what I understand. In my case, all the oracle RMAN backups go directly to the DD instead of going through the storage node using DFA. Everything else (standard FS backups for example) needs to go through the storage node.

    Networker 8.0 adds support for simple NW clients (filesystem) to dedup directly to DD:

    From NW 8.0 release notes:

    The EMC NetWorker 8.0 releases provide significant functional enhancements, including

    support for the following:

    • Direct File Access (DFA) enhancements, including support for DD Boost and standard AFTD devices, and the ability to bypass the NetWorker storage node and send data directly to a Data Domain system.

    From the data domain integration guide (7.6), see table 2 on page 17. It states that DFA backup is not supported for filesystem backups in earlier version than 8.0.

    UPDATE: I just re-read the table and your post.. it indicates that recovers support DFA. Oops. I will try multiple recovers at the same time then, I only tried with clones running, and that fails. Maybe if there's no clones, multiple recovers would work..

  • lapfrank1234

    1 Rookie

    23 Posts

    1109

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 14:00

    For me, it happens every time more than one recover and/or clone session is trying to read from an AFTD device, which is a limitation of NW 7.x (only one recover/clone session on AFTP at a time).

  • Thierry101

    2 Intern

    326 Posts

    625

    0

    Posted February 14th, 2013 14:00

    LOL...but nope