Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
24 Posts
0
6722
November 26th, 2007 20:00
Consolidating Virtual Disks
I currently have two Virtual Disks set up as RAID-10 (one with 14 136gb drives, the other with 4 300gb drives) which contain data. A third Virtual Disk (RAID-1) contains the OS, but I am not altering that. I want to consolidate the two data Virtual Disks in an effort to streamline our file structure. However, they are on different connectors of the RAID controller and the resulting Virtual Disk will be mixing two different capacity drives.
Here's my question - is it advisable to create a single Virtual Disk (RAID-10) that will be approximately 1.5tb? I've heard that RAID-5 becomes unstable with larger drives. Do I need to worry about RAID-10?
As far as I can figure, I will have to backup all my data and completely break apart the current Virtual Disks and then rebuild a single Virtual Disk. Is that correct? Both of these are BASIC disks.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-Steve
My Setup:
PE2600 Win2003 Server Standard Edition, SP2
Perc 4/DC RAID Controller
PV220 External Data Array
Virtual Disk 0: RAID-1 (2 34gb SCSIs on backplane - contains system)
Virtual Disk 1: RAID-10 (14 136gb SCSIs in PV220)
Virtual Disk 2: RAID-10 (4 280gb SCSIs on backplane)
Here's my question - is it advisable to create a single Virtual Disk (RAID-10) that will be approximately 1.5tb? I've heard that RAID-5 becomes unstable with larger drives. Do I need to worry about RAID-10?
As far as I can figure, I will have to backup all my data and completely break apart the current Virtual Disks and then rebuild a single Virtual Disk. Is that correct? Both of these are BASIC disks.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-Steve
My Setup:
PE2600 Win2003 Server Standard Edition, SP2
Perc 4/DC RAID Controller
PV220 External Data Array
Virtual Disk 0: RAID-1 (2 34gb SCSIs on backplane - contains system)
Virtual Disk 1: RAID-10 (14 136gb SCSIs in PV220)
Virtual Disk 2: RAID-10 (4 280gb SCSIs on backplane)
No Events found!


jcn77056
667 Posts
0
November 27th, 2007 16:00
snapohead
1.2K Posts
0
November 27th, 2007 20:00
Dev Mgr
6 Operator
•
9.3K Posts
•
3 Points
0
November 28th, 2007 11:00
smallest drive size x (number of drives - 1)
With raid 10 (or raid 1) the formula is:
smallest drive size / 2
So if you mix 146GB drives and 300GB drives, you indeed will only be able to use 146GB on each of the 300's.