Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

1 Rookie

 • 

35 Posts

11201

December 23rd, 2011 06:00

Starter iscsi and network switches

I want to start small on iscsi and looking at the md3220i and network switches.  Can i scale a smaller switch with a smaller number of ports to help the cost?  What is the smallest switch model i can use.  thanks.  

6 Operator

 • 

9.3K Posts

 • 

3 Points

December 25th, 2011 11:00

A decent entry level iSCSI switch (from Dell) would be a 5424 if you can find one. Dell sold these for around US$800 when they still had them on their website.

The 5500-series (5524 or so) isn't recommended with the current firmware for Equallogic implementations, but I'm not sure how 'good' they are for MD-series iSCSI implementations.

Anything less than 24 ports puts you in the series of switches that cannot realistically sustain any decent iSCSI traffic (too small a buffer, too slow a processor, no support for the features you want from an iSCSI switch).

2 Intern

 • 

847 Posts

December 27th, 2011 12:00

I dunno.   We use cheap 16 port unmannaged D-Link switches and they work fine using Vmware.  Sustain proper throughput and all and should be fine for MD series iSCSI sans in general.   They are like cheapo DG-1016's.   You would need 4 of them for the 3220i.  Way less reccomended for other iSCSI Sans for sure.

January 2nd, 2012 10:00

I'm about to try Dell 5224 switches out with my MD3000i and VMWARE ESXI 5.0

2 Intern

 • 

185 Posts

January 3rd, 2012 07:00

52xx will NOT work, better use HP V1810-24G 24 Port Gigabit Switch Manufacturer Part No: J9450A

Seb

12 Posts

January 5th, 2012 03:00

spgsit, can you elaborate on why 52xx won't work?

Thanks.

6 Operator

 • 

9.3K Posts

 • 

3 Points

January 5th, 2012 10:00

I know that Dell's 53xx couldn't sustain jumbo frame iSCSI traffic, which is why that model should be avoided for any iSCSI implementation.

I don't know if the same applied to the even older 52xx-series.

No Events found!

Top