This post is more than 5 years old
20 Posts
0
1125
November 23rd, 2009 10:00
Anyone seeing issues with BCV on HPUX Itanium?
Have been doing BCV refreshes for years on HPUX 11i (PARisc) server. Moved over our BCV refreshes to new 11.31 (Itanium) server.
Everything worked ok......
But noticed if I did an LVM increase to a logical volume, the change is not being reflected on the BCV side. I can even go through all
the steps to vgexport/vgimport and resync everything and as I knew this LVM change will not be reflected. [ And for those HPUX folks like me,
yes I know that vgexport does not reflect LVM sizing changes, but I was hoping an export/import might give it a "tap" and help - it didn't ]
Resync'ing does not reflect at the LVM level that a new disk or even that an increase on an existing disk in the logical volume was made.
Obviously it has to do with the changes to LVM in 11.31 Itanium, but does anyone know of a patch either on EMC side or HPUX side that
will address this?
Up to this point I have had to fix the BCV side manually. And yes, I'm also referring this over to HP.
Thanks,
Rita


SKT2
2 Intern
•
1.3K Posts
0
November 24th, 2009 01:00
RitaWorkman
20 Posts
0
November 24th, 2009 04:00
No. It does not mount using mount command.
Tried running fsck to address lvol and got following error:
vxfs fsck: V-3-25290: could not red from block offset devid/vlknum 0/88309758. Device may be missing in vset.
vxfs fsck: V-3-20694: cannot initialize aggregate
file system check failure, aborting ...
What I did was to manually increase the volume group's lvol on the BCV side and run vgcfgbackup. Then I did a resync (full) of all the disks associated to that lvol, after which I ran fsck on the lvol (fsadm -F vxfs -y -o full /dev/vg/lvol) and it ran at that point. I was able to mount up the BCV side of the file system.
But.......
When it goes to run again the full BCV refresh cycle - once again it fails on same lvol. When you re-display the volume group - the settings are back to the old values for this lvol. As though I had never manually reset them.
/rcw
RitaWorkman
20 Posts
0
November 30th, 2009 07:00
I am going to close this discussion, since I found a resolution.
Basically, from an HPUX perspective, I forced it back to basics.
The disk increase came from a disk already in the volume group, so it should have been a simple thing to increase the size on the primary/host side. Since there really was not change that would require a mapfile update, the increase should have been reflected at the next refresh. But it wasn't quite working out right.
So I took the BCV side fully back to ground zero. I dismounted the whole group of disks for the whole disk group. I made all the affected volume groups inactive. I them pvcreated every last BCV disk involved and rebuilt the BCV side (using the same disk(s) ) over again, as if doing it for the first time. Ran fsck on the lvols and everyone ran clean, including the one give me headaches. Mount file systems manually and they all mounted up clean.
I then did manual run of the script we use for automation, that will dismount again, de-activate volume groups, run an incremental sync and remount the BCV's again. It ran clean. Ran it again - it ran clean.
So it appears that 'maybe', since I'm mixing sync'ing up from PARisc primary side to an Itanium BCV side, something is just not handling simple increases at the LVM level. I know there were changes to the LVM structure when it hit Itanium, but didn't think it would affect it like this.
I have no issues if I create a new lvol and attach disk & make the required adjustements. The next refresh cycle automation script runs fine.
It is only with simple increases to an lvol (even with existing available disk) that I'm seeing this.
The resolution > redo the entire BCV creation process as if you were setting it up for the very first time.
Regards,
Rita
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
November 30th, 2009 07:00
snirmal123
37 Posts
0
December 1st, 2009 20:00
Maybe it has to do with vxfs filesystem version mis-match of some sort?
Can you tell the vxfs versions on both sides i.e. standard and BCV hosts?
RitaWorkman
20 Posts
0
April 29th, 2010 06:00
Actually the file systems mount at the same version level.
rawstorage
4 Apprentice
•
423 Posts
0
May 5th, 2010 08:00
Rita,
I'm not a HP-UX expert but maybe the filesystem information is still being cached on the host that mounts the standard device; Issuing sync command to flush the buffers then doing incremental establish/split again to pick up the change might help.