UNSOLVED

Larna

updated

16 years ago

L

Larna

1 Rookie

51 Posts

0

26443

December 16th, 2009 09:00

Vista/Windows Defender/Mcafee

I bought a laptop just over a year ago with a subscription to McAfee already installed.  The OP is Vista Home Edition.  I find that McAfee and 'Windows Defender'  are often scanning at the same time.  Is this necessary, and if not, why did Dell install 2 Virus applications?

Also, it takes McAfee 5 DAYS to complete a scan, whether or not Defender is scanning at the same time.  This causes problems if Windows Update decides to restart the computer before McAfee has completed the scan.  Why is McAfee taking so long when the laptop is not my main PC and I don't have many files on there?

  • joe53

    5 Journeyman

    5772 Posts

    17269 Points

    795

    0

    Posted December 16th, 2009 13:00

    I hate to slag legitimate security products, but I can't help noticing recurring complaints about McAfee and Norton in this board.

    No doubt many use them without problems, but I have to agree I wouldn't want either of them on my PC.

    Just my 2 pesos.

    Free Security Software-A Primer

  • osprey4

    6 Operator

    34230 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 16th, 2009 09:00

    Hi, Larna:

    Windows Defender is part of the operating system. Dell did not install it. As for McAfee, I think you've stumbled onto the reason most people use something else. You'll notice this review, where they state, "McAfee is one of the slowest scanning programs we tested, taking almost 84 minutes to scan our test computer's 70 GB of used hard-drive space. McAfee took about double as long to scan our test computer than the top 2 antivirus programs..."

    Take care!

  • Larna

    1 Rookie

    51 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 16th, 2009 10:00

    Thanks for that.  I wish it only took 84 minutes to scan my laptop, instead of 5 days.

    My renewal for McAfee is due in March, and after reading your link, I am sure that I will go for the Norton Internet 2010 instead.

  • Bugbatter

    4 Apprentice

    20487 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 16th, 2009 12:00

    Are you using a 2009 McAfee product?


    "The 2009 McAfee consumer products for Windows Vista disable Microsoft Windows Defender to improve system performance. Windows Vista users who have installed the 2009 McAfee consumer products should not enable Windows Defender."
    http://service.mcafee.com/faqdocument.aspx?id=TS100610&lang=en_US&prior_tid=2&AnswerID=16777216&turl==http%3A%2F%2Fkb.mcafee.com%2Finfocenter%2Findex%3Fpage%3Dcontent%26id%3DTS100610%26actp%3Dsearch


    Just my opinion, but I wouldn't bother with Norton either.

    Please see these pages for

    FREE SECURITY SOFTWARE  

    FREE SECURITY SOFTWARE

     

     

     

  • dalem29

    2 Intern

    2198 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 17th, 2009 05:00

    I just have to second the motion for the wisdom of using the free stand alone security products in the lists and article mentioned above. I haven't used a paid product for several years and seem to do just fine on both my main computer and backup.

  • Larna

    1 Rookie

    51 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 18th, 2009 03:00

    My McAfee product was originally installed on my desktop in December 2005 when I bought it, and is just called 'McAfee Security Centre'.  I renew it every year, and it also now runs on my Laptop which I purchased in September 2008.  It was last renewed in February 2009 and it has virus scan, personal firewall, and antispam.

    Strange thing is that it takes only about 2 hours to scan my desktop (My Documents are 30gb), and that is not a problem for me, but it takes about 5 days to scan my laptop (My Documents are 10gb)! 

    Both PC's have the same sized harddrive - 160gb.

    If the free antivirus does the same job I would be very interested as these things all add up when living on a pension.

    I did wonder if it has something to do with the OP on the laptop (Vista), as all is OK on the desktop which has XP.

     

     

  • TheRealFireblad

    4 Apprentice

    4639 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 18th, 2009 07:00

    I personally use Eset's 'Smart Security 4', and usually just run a 'Smart Scan' (/quick scan) on my C:\ partition, to check for potential problems?

    A quick scan doesn't take too long at all (a few seconds over 12mins on my 60GB C:\ partition), but it's never uncovered any suspect files.

    That's undoubtedly because the program does such a good job of keeping an eye on any files I download in the first place.

    It's unobtrusive, uses hardly any system resources, and updates the virus definitions 3 - 4 times a day, without fail :emotion-11:

     

    I've read many good reports about Kaspersky Internet Security recently though.

    In fact one review of anti virus/internet security packages I read a couple of months ago, rated it above Eset - which in itself says a lot for it's capabilities!

    Not only that... but it's cheaper than Eset Smart Security. 

    For instance - I ordered a retail boxed 3-user/1 year version off Amazon for a friend (and his granddaughter) just last week, for only £26.xx (US$42.xx) :emotion-3:

    An OEM 1-user/1 year version is available for less than half that.

    In either case - it's a small price to pay (IMHO), for one of the best internet security packages available these days :emotion-21:

  • Larna

    1 Rookie

    51 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 18th, 2009 10:00

    Thanks for the info.

    Regarding the slow (extremely) virus scanning on my laptop, I have just had the same problems when trying to 'rip' a music CD.

    I have not tried to rip music before, and I inserted my CD and used the 'rip' function on WMP.  It has been running for 4 hours and has only ripped 5 tracks!  There is something not right with this laptop and I just do not know what it is.

    I have ejected the CD from the laptop and inserted in my desktop.  It took SECONDS to rip the remaining 12 tracks!! (again using WMP)

  • TheRealFireblad

    4 Apprentice

    4639 Posts

    795

    0

    Posted December 18th, 2009 12:00

    Have you scanned your system for spyware recently?  Malwarebytes Anti-Malware is the program recommended by the aficionados in this forums section.

     

    But I'd also recommend running another free program called CCleaner.

    It'll scan your system for any invalid/junk files, and get rid of them for you (after you tick the appropriate boxes, by choosing 'Select All' when asked).

     

    Hopefully between them, those two will cure the problem?

  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    15622 Posts

    45048 Points

    484

    0

    Posted December 19th, 2009 08:00

    Larna,

    another possibility is that your IDE channels were changed from DMA (Direct Memory Access --- which is FAST) to PIO (Primary Input/Output --- which is SLOW).

    check by RIGHT-clicking on MY COMPUTER, select PROPERTIES, the HARDWARE tab, and then DEVICE MANAGER.

    click on the + to expand IDA ATA/ATAPI Controllers.

    RIGHT-click on the PRIMARY IDE Channel, select PROPERTIES, then ADVANCED SETTINGS.

    The TRANSFER MODE should say DMA if available, and the

    CURRENT TRANSFER mode should indicate something like ULTRA DMA Mode 5.   If this shows PIO, you have a problem.

    Likewise for the SECONDARY IDE Channel, which should have a CURRENT TRANSFER mode like ULTRA DMA Mode 2.

    if either shows PIO, you can  RIGHT-click on, and UNINSTALL either or both of these two controllers --- you'll then have to reboot, at which point Windows should automatically find the controllers and try to reset them to DMA mode (unless there's another problem with your system).

    Unfortunately, I am away on vacation, and may not be in a position to offer you additional help here.... so hopefully someone else will step in.

    NOTE:   If the CURRENT Transfer mode shows DMA, then just leave things alone.