UNSOLVED

DanJost

updated

16 years ago

D

DanJost

190 Posts

0

1327

July 23rd, 2010 14:00

Time to buy storage

And I'm throwing around some ideas...light reading for the weekend if you will...

I have some 500GB SATA II drives (whole shelf) which have some "images" on them (some is an understatement - more like 1.6TB of them after being deduped) as well as some savvols.  I have 9 drives allocated to the Celerra, which is roughly 3.6TB of space.  I have about 1.3TB of "archive" stuff that for various reasons needs to stick around. The pool has about 400GB free

I have another "set" of images (these are worked on a little more frequently) on an 8+1 R5 on 300GB/10K drives.  The filesystem is nearly full and the pool is also nearly maxed out.

My main production sit on 4+1 sets on 146GB/15K drives - home dirs, file-based databases (a lot of these), etc... This we won't touch, we have free space, etc..plus once Rainfinity is in place those pesky iTunes files will live on something slower...

So, to archive some more of the data from the second set of images to make room for more productions, I need some more space.

I also have a pending EmailXtender to SourceOne migration - we will want to store the volumes on the NAS so they get replicated.  I don't think I want to put these on low-powered SATA drives.  The EX archives are roughly .5TB which grows about 5-8GB a month.

I have two choices here - either I add some more SATA or some more 10K FC drives.

If I add some more 10K 600GB drives for the 8+1 pool, I'd move the existing images on the SATA to these drives and liberate the SATA drives to be a target for Rainfinity.  Any comments on using a R6-12+2 configuration?  If it is the only SATA shelf I've got, then I'll need to keep a hot spare around so I can't do a 3xR5-4+1.  I'm assuming that if I get the savvols and file systems off the SATA drives I can yank those out of the config and reintroduce those are the R6...?

If I go the SATA route with R6, the existing SATA drives won't pool with those (unless of course I bring them in as R5..) but I'll have a load of space available.  I just don't like the idea of getting more slow drives but this IS for archiving purposes...  Also, if I need more high-performance storage I'll need to shuffle something to the SATA or get another DAE.  Plus I've got nowhere but SATA to move the Xtender archives.

I guess I have a third option - just put in the SATA drives in a RAID5, throw away the Rainfinities, move my production set of images to it, extend the filesystems, and call it a day

Thoughts?

Dan

  • Rainer_EMC

    6 Operator

    8645 Posts

    744

    1

    Posted July 27th, 2010 16:00

    Hi Dan,

    most likely your SATA drives are now in the clarata_archive pool

    new SATA drives you could configure either with 6+1R5 or 4+1R5 or 8+1R5 if you want them to also be in clarata_archive

    two 6+1R5 plus a hot spare fills a DAE nicely

    or do 4+2R6 or 6+2R6 or 12+2R6 but then they would go into clarata_r6

    If you want to go Raid6 and have only one ATA pool I would create 12+2R6 for the new disks, move the file systems using Replicator and reconfigure the old disks as a 6+2R6

    Personally I think 6+1R5 is reasonable with SATA disks if you have your alerting configured so that you know about broken disks immediately

    Rainer

  • DanJost

    190 Posts

    744

    0

    Posted August 2nd, 2010 12:00

    What are your thoughts on the 2TB drives?  Would going with a R5 6+1 be unreasonable for a rebuild time?  The price/GB is neglible between the 1TB and 2TB (comparing a full shelf of 1TB and a shelf with 8 2TB drives - but getting the 1/2 full shelf would give me some expansion done the road)

    Dan

  • ral67_xyz

    147 Posts

    744

    0

    Posted August 3rd, 2010 13:00

    thanks - but that document is a bit dated :-)

  • dynamox

    11 Legend

    20419 Posts

    87439 Points

    744

    0

    Posted August 3rd, 2010 13:00

    if you are bored (i think you are ..it's 22:40 in Munich )..this document has rebuild information

    https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-6261

  • ral67_xyz

    147 Posts

    744

    1

    Posted August 3rd, 2010 13:00

    personally I prefer to have at least two raidgroups like 2x 4+1R5    We do benefit from having multiple devices per fs since we can queue more outstanding IOs which can be more important than the sheer number of disks    I haven't seen rebuild times - maybe the Clariion forum has more info      Rainer

  • dynamox

    11 Legend

    20419 Posts

    87439 Points

    744

    0

    Posted August 3rd, 2010 14:00

    that's all i got, you are welcome to post some docs from CSPEED website

  • DanJost

    190 Posts

    744

    0

    Posted August 5th, 2010 06:00

    After some deliberation, we've decided to go with 1TB 7200RPM drives with two R5 6+1 raidgroups - it's the least painful as far as moving data around.  I already have an R5 8+1 500GB set in this pool and with some other gyrations I could have a 4+1 500GB to add if this doesn't hold me out until I can go back for more.  

    One last question ...How many LUNs do I need to use on these RAID groups?  In the past I remember that there was a 2TB limit on the LUN size - if this is still the case, would I bind 3 or 4 since a 6+1 yields roughly 5.4TB?  I'm sure there is a doc out there that covers this - heading over to powerlink to see if I can dig it up...

    Dan

  • SAMEERK1

    296 Posts

    109

    0

    Posted August 5th, 2010 07:00

    Thats good to split the LUN's between SP's but in later versions of Dart you can create a single LUN also.

    Sameer

  • kensagle

    59 Posts

    744

    0

    Posted August 5th, 2010 07:00

    Make the number of LUNs even so you can split them between the SP’s. 4 should work.

  • DanJost

    190 Posts

    109

    0

    Posted September 15th, 2010 08:00

    Just to close the loop on this -

    As stated before, I went with 1TB drives but I'm replacing the 500GB hot spare in my other shelf so I can have three 4+1 R5 groups instead of two 6+1's.  I'll end up with the same space (12 drives worth after RAID overhead).  For the extra bucks, the shorter rebuild times and the common remark about the Celerra working "mo betta" with more RG's I feel it was worth the (relative) small expense.

    Thanks for all the comments and words of wisdom.

    Dan