UNSOLVED

mronquillo1

updated

18 years ago

M

mronquillo1

10 Posts

0

803

May 23rd, 2008 20:00

ATA RAID3 vs RAID5

For large, sequential IO, I've seen RAID3 recommended for ATA. What advantages does RAID3 have over RAID5, especially since RAID5 can do MR3 writes?
  • Kiran3

    410 Posts

    354

    0

    Posted May 26th, 2008 00:00

    here is a link that discusses RAID3 and RAID5

    http://www.bytepile.com/RAID_3_vs_RAID_5_In_HPC.php
  • ksnell

    38 Posts

    354

    0

    Posted May 27th, 2008 22:00

    Since the introduction of 8 stripe parity across all disk types on CLARiiON for Raid 5, bandwidth is comparable to that achieved with Raid 3.

    The data path is shorter for Raid 3 thus a very marginal performance gain can be achieved.

    That said, as per the other reply reference, the conclusion is such that unless you have specific single thread large block sequential as an exclusive access profile per disk group (and they rarely are), the recomendation would be to go with Raid 5.
  • RRR

    6 Operator

    5739 Posts

    354

    0

    Posted May 28th, 2008 00:00

    That said, as per the other reply reference, the conclusion is such that unless you have specific single thread large block sequential as an exclusive access profile per disk group (and they rarely are), the recomendation would be to go with Raid 5.


    I expect this to be true for newer Flare codes an newly created Raid Groups.
    I'd say if you come from Flare 19 and you created a RG in Flare 19, that upgrading to Flare 26 doesn't improve data throughput at all, since the layout of the parity isn't suddenly changed. Am I right here ?