Its community supported versus RHEL 4 which has a vendor and OEM to support it. There is nothing wrong with Fedora Core, but it all comes down to one question. If there is a bug that takes down your server, do you want to wait on a news group to resolve the problem or get the vendor on the phone and start working on the problem.
Eric, just to let you know that the reason why we're running core is because it was recommended by one of our partners and we've been running it for 2 years now. Too much work to rebuild and put RHEL on it. Also, can someone help me with configuring SNMP so I can have my IT Assistant see this server running OpenManage
Eric, quick question, if i wanted to upgrade to Fedora 5, then what version of Red Hat would be compatible so I can get the correct version of OpenManage?
There is no need to guess. FC3 uses similar libraries and kernel to RHEL 4. FC4 and FC5 are improvements on FC3, but RHEL 4 doesn't have any of its base requirements on either version. i.e. FC5 is currently using 2.6.17 kernel with some 2.6.18 patches. RHEL 5 beta is currently using the 2.6.18 kernel, but is much closer to FC 6 than FC5.
RHEL 5 isn't due out until after the new year, but FC6 may ship before that.
Eric BY
2 Intern
•
815 Posts
363
0
Posted October 9th, 2006 00:00