Both solutions are made for same workload, only difference in request is FICON modules (not number of ports)
Any clue why the 2nd solution took 2 engines? I think it because of FICON port count from 8 to 16. But if 8 ports enough for SM, does it really required 16 ports with MM? Any suggestions! Thanks
Ugin
1 Rookie
•
122 Posts
1156
0
Posted February 10th, 2017 02:00
Max front-end I/O modules/
engine
Front-end I/O modules and
protocols supported
FC: 4 x 8Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FC: 4 x 16Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FICON: 4 x 16Gbs (FICON)
FCoE: 4 x 10GbE (FCoE)
iSCSI: 4 x 10 GbE (iSCSI)
GbE: 2/2 Opt/Cu (SRDF)
10GbE: 2 x 10GbE (SRDF)
FC: 4 x 8Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FC: 4 x 16Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FICON: 4 x 16Gbs (FICON)
FCoE: 4 x 10GbE (FCoE)
iSCSI: 4 x 10 GbE (iSCSI)
GbE: 2/2 Opt/Cu (SRDF)
10GbE: 2 x 10GbE (SRDF)
FC: 4 x 8Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FC: 4 x 16Gbs (FC, SRDF)
FICON: 4 x 16Gbs (FICON)
FCoE: 4 x 10GbE (FCoE)
iSCSI: 4 x 10 GbE (iSCSI)
GbE: 2/2 Opt/Cu (SRDF)
10GbE: 2 x 10GbE (SRDF)
Found this above information in VMAX 3 product guide page 25