Hi:

Tell them that it's always wise to have a second browser, in case IE crashes. Then after they have had experience with both browser's pro's and cons, they can decide which is the better default browser for their purposes.

I think the biggest con is the hype that Firefox is a "safer" browser. At worst, this can foster a false sense of confidence, and to ignoring basic practises of safe surfing. Or to thinking that using Firefox negates the need for good anti-malware programs.

That aside, I returned to IE because it is simply more functional. Most websites are still optimised for IE, (including these forums). I got tired of websites with features that wouldn't work using Firefox. And I have yet to regret doing so- my PC's have been malware-free for years.

---

@GreyMack wrote:

The default configuration of IE has been a disgrace, but it can be improved. If the default configuration of either browser is to be used, Firefox may be the better choice.

GM

---

GM:

It's been so long since I've used the default configuration for IE.  You might be correct, But there are so many resources out there with advice on how to lock down IE...

---

beneteau wrote:
joe53:

.... Answer this question----why, after many years and hundreds of patches and so-called fixes, has Microsoft "now" decided to release a "new" version of IE? If IE is not "broke", why is Microsoft trying to fix it? ...

---

Hey beneteau:

Why has Firefox released a "new" version (1.5) if previous versions weren't broke?

That was a rhetorical q of course. I have nothing against Firefox, I just find IE more useful, and it has never caused me any problems. Patches to IE are automatic, whereas new versions of Firefox require saving preferences and downloading a whole new browser for installing. Major nuisance factor.

Congrats if you've found a way to make sites (including this one) fully functional- I have not. I've always followed the dictum: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". And IE delivers for me, without problems/malware.  I gave Firefox a good tryout- but in the end I chose IE. Which is why I always advise others to give both a good try. And to choosse the one that works best for your needs.

Firefox is good for surfing sites of unknown reputation, but there is no substitute for good anti-malware, A/V and firewall programs.

 

Firefox, is really good at blocking spyware.  But don't go to crack sites.  No matter what browser you use...They throw trojans/spyware/virus/worms at you.  REALLY Dangerous.   

 

Reasons to get firefox:

Safer to use

Built In RSS feed. 

build in Search Engines

Faster

Will Automatically Update itself  (only if you enable it)

Built in pop-up blocker.  Really Useful If you have Windows XP SP1

encrypted information is sent securly

Customize The way Firefox looks

Web Support

cool Firefox skins

Add cools Buttons to the bars.  Like print,

Built in Java. 

Has support for Internet Explorer (it says For Internet Explorer users)  Internet Explorer says Netscape.

Been Downloaded over 100 million times....  Microsoft still has the lead though.

 

Hope You..and your friend Choose Firefox.  happy

joe53:

Never have a problem browsing any website with Firefox and can fully utilize functions/features of these forums with Firefox. Just need to add the "right" extensions to Firefox. And, I will differ with anyone stating that Firefox is not a safer browser than IE. Answer this question----why, after many years and hundreds of patches and so-called fixes, has Microsoft "now" decided to release a "new" version of IE? If IE is not "broke", why is Microsoft trying to fix it? One answer---the competition has a better product and IE is continuing to lose "market share".

If you want to read 38 pages of forum posts regarding popular browsers that started in August 2004 and continues today go here.