UNSOLVED

Coupe51

updated

22 years ago

C

Coupe51

1 Message

0

9982

September 13th, 2004 13:00

Celeron versus Pentium

Can someone tell me briefly the advantage of a Pentium 4 processor over the Celeron..?

 

                   Thank you

  • 222

    0

    Posted September 13th, 2004 14:00

    The Pentium has what you could term a built in co-processor to perform the heavier math functions as well as a larger cache memory built into the chip itself. Also the Pentium has the built in functions which the programs can activate which will heighten performance...speed up...the funtionality. The Celeron is the "value' processor and to be quite honest with you it isn't even worth considering anymore as the Pentium 4 Processors are now very affordable. Also I don't even think Dell uses the Celeron in anything anymore...I believe all is Pentium 4 now. Hope this helps.
  • speedstep

    11 Legend

    46969 Posts

    222

    0

    Posted September 13th, 2004 20:00

    There are 3 Generations of Celeron.

    The most Recent Celeron 3's are just the same as the Pentium4 down to the socket 478 mounting. The only major difference is the cache which is smaller.

    The core corresponds pretty much to the Pentium 4 Willamette,
    which has been available since the introduction of socket 423.

    100 MHz quad-pumped Front Side Bus (= 400 MHz), providing 3.2 GB/s
    High clock speeds (1.7 GHz, faster versions to follow)
    1.75 V core voltage
    Socket mPGA478
    128 KB full speed L2 cache
    Instruction Trace Cache
    Rapid Execution Engine
    SSE2-Instruction Engine


    The release of faster Celerons like the new 2.8 GHz version was only a matter of time. On the one hand, the Celeron Willamette cannot compete with the predecessor Tualatin at the same clock speed; that's why it strongly needs higher frequency to justify its existence. On the other hand, the Willamette core with its 0.18 µm is able to run at least 2.8 GHz

    The transition from Socket 370 to Socket 478 does not only entail better performance, but also reduces system costs considerably by virtue of raising production quantities for motherboards and chipsets. Basic motherboards with e.g. Intel's 845/865/875 chipsets or SIS 645DX can be used both for the Pentium 4
    and the Celeron.

    I also don't see any Hyperthreading celerons so if Dualcpu
    performance is your Aim then there are low cost Pentium4's in
    a very similar price range.

    Basically the Higer speed celerons selling at under $99 are to
    keep amd and their Duron's at bay.
  • joemomma

    40 Posts

    222

    0

    Posted September 14th, 2004 18:00

    BTW, Dell still sells Celeron-based PCs.
  • tigerwolf7

    2 Intern

    3906 Posts

    222

    0

    Posted September 15th, 2004 06:00

    The Celeron line has always been based off the current "regular" chip.  There's no difference except that they usually have less cache and a slower front side bus.  In the case of the Pentium 4 based Celerons, their performance is terrible compared to an equivalently clocked P4.  They'd be okay in a Dimension 2400 system for word processing and web browsing, but don't get one if you're remotely interested in anything high-end like gaming (a Celeron or a 2400).