I have a new M100e enclosure with a PS4110xs SAN, a few blade servers and two Force10 MXL switches (switches and SAN on fabric A)
I have it all set up and working fine, but using the default VLAN for everything
I want to hook the switches up to a Juniper EX3300 via SFP+ ports and route the SAN subnet out so that I can remotely connect to the management IP of the EqualLogic for VMM integration
However, whenever I try and put the SAN ports into a separate VLAN - even before I look into trunking to the Juniper - I lose all connectivity on the SAN network.
I've created a new VLAN (VLAN120) but as soon as I put ports into it they cannot ping each other.
int vlan120
tagged te0/1 (This is the SAN port)
tagged te0/12 (this is one server)
tagged te0/16 (this is the other server)
as soon as I do that I lose all connectivity to the SAN and the servers cannot ping each other over the iSCSI network.
I've tried using 'untagged' intead of 'tagged' with the same effect.
I figured out the issue - I had 2 trunk links into VLAN120 from the Juniper - as soon as I disabled the second interface it all sprang into life
Now I need to try and figure out how to set up a LAG between the two MXL's in the stack and a Juniper ex3300 - I've managed to get the connectivity I need but with only a single link - as it's a remote site I want some redundancy :-)
There is no routing - all layer 2 - everything is in the same subnet. When I take them out of the VLAN (No tagged te0/16 etc..) they all start working again.
I tried that on one of the interfaces, but get the following errors
int te0/16
no tagged interface
^
% Error: Invalid input at "^" marker.
no switchport
%error: Port has Layer-2 config on it Te 0/16.
show config
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet 0/16
no ip address
mtu 12000
switchport
flowcontrol rx on tx off
spanning-tree rstp edge-port
no shutdown
also when I have either tagged or untagged a port to VLAN120 I can see that is no longer associated with VLAN1 by doing a show vlan command
for this example I just did it to one port to show you
show vlan
Codes: * - Default VLAN, G - GVRP VLANs, R - Remote Port Mirroring VLANs, P - Primary, C - Community, I - Isolated O - Openflow Q: U - Untagged, T - Tagged x - Dot1x untagged, X - Dot1x tagged o - OpenFlow untagged, O - OpenFlow tagged G - GVRP tagged, M - Vlan-stack, H - VSN tagged i - Internal untagged, I - Internal tagged, v - VLT untagged, V - VLT tagged
NUM Status Description Q Ports * 1 Active U Po1() U Te 0/1-15,17-32,42-44,49-56 U Te 1/1-32,42-44,49-56 120 Active T Te 0/41 U Te 0/16 T Te 1/41
Do the servers have NICs in VLAN 1 as well? Having both VLANs use the same subnet shouldn’t be a problem if they are fully isolated from each other, but the fact that it works in VLAN 1 and not when it is in VLAN 120 seems like there is some sort of conflict.
m455954
12 Posts
1214
0
Posted March 17th, 2015 11:00
I figured out the issue - I had 2 trunk links into VLAN120 from the Juniper - as soon as I disabled the second interface it all sprang into life
Now I need to try and figure out how to set up a LAG between the two MXL's in the stack and a Juniper ex3300 - I've managed to get the connectivity I need but with only a single link - as it's a remote site I want some redundancy :-)