UNSOLVED

joe53

updated

16 years ago

J

joe53

5 Journeyman

5772 Posts

17269 Points

0

7547

August 12th, 2010 15:00

Virus Bulletin VB100 August 2010 Tests Released.

AVs were tested on Windows Vista SP2 Business Edition.

Notable AVs with Fail status include:

- BitDefender (15 false positives)
- GDATA (15 false positives)
- McAfee  (5 wildlist misses)

All the AVs that offer free versions recommended often in this forum (Avast, Avira, MSE) passed.

Complete results here: http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/2010/08
(Free registration may be required).

One-time static detection tests are but one of many aspects to consider when choosing an AV, but when several such tests are reviewed over time, do help to narrow down the field of choices. You can review the VB100 test history for most individual AVs at this site.
-----------------------------------------

Also of interest is VB's RAP  (Reactive And Proactive detection) Test summary, which averages 4 RAP tests conducted between Feb- August 2010, and evaluates AVs effectiveness against recently released malware:
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml

Results are presented in summary graph form, which plots Reactive Detection against Proactive Detection. The better performing AVs are found in the upper-right quadrant.

Because higher detection rates can be generated by any AV, at the expense of detecting more False Positives, all tests of individual AVs that included FPs were not averaged into these results, to level the playing field.

Comparatively speaking, Avira, Avast and MSE aquitted themselves very well in these tests also.

 

  • joe53

    5 Journeyman

    5772 Posts

    17269 Points

    234

    0

    Posted August 12th, 2010 19:00

    GDATA combines two anti-virus engines:  BitDefender + Avast.   It is therefore understandable that GDATA exhibit (at least) as many FP's as BitDefender.

    Moral of the story: 2 engines are not necessarily better than one!  :emotion-5:

    And since Avast had no FPs, I think it is safe to assume all in GDATA were due to BD.

  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    15622 Posts

    45048 Points

    234

    0

    Posted August 12th, 2010 18:00

    GDATA combines two anti-virus engines:  BitDefender + Avast.   It is therefore understandable that GDATA exhibit (at least) as many FP's as BitDefender.

  • 234

    0

    Posted November 2nd, 2010 22:00

    {$content}


    Why this? Could you give more detailed description? Maybe it's stupid to ask such a question.