I recently installed and configured a pair of CISCO 9148 switches running IOS 5.2(6a). I configured the TE ports and connected them to my core switches (MDS 9509). No host is zoned there yet. We now have a change in our plans and want to use that pair for NPIV type ports for 2012 Hyper V(Virtual HBAs). I have a few questions.
1. Can I mix ports on the switch(so non virtual and virtual)?
2. If so, should I leave the TE ports connected and then configured the N port on the 9148 to connect to an N port on the core? I know I have to enable NPIV on the core first.
3. Before enabling NPIV on the 9148 do I have to remove the TE connection? I know that enabling NPIV on the edge switch is distruptive.
so you have TE ports going between 9148 and 9509, good. Now simply enable NPIV on 9148 and it's not disruptive (where did you see that it was disruptive ?) .
why do you want NPV on 9148 ? Are you going to have a huge fabric that you want to save domain ids? Look into nested NPV and see if it's going to be supported in your setup ..but honestly why make things more complicated ?
that's fine, by enabling NPIV on 9148 it will allow Hyper-V virtual machines to login to the fabric and get their own fcid ..at that point you will be able to provision storage as if they were "physical" hosts.
Thank you Dynamox for all of your help today! Our windows admins will be adding an additional 450 servers to the HYPER-V environment and want to use virtual IPs. I am of the same mindset you are, however, our management sides with the Windows folks.
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20419 Posts
•
87439 Points
1017
0
Posted June 25th, 2013 13:00
you don't even need to enable NPIV on 9509, 9148 is sufficient.