Discovery errors: Agent loops in response to GET_NEXT
We are having a discovery problem with Brocade/Foundry switches. On certain model switches, we get a discovery error of “SWFE-E-ELOOP-Agent loops in response to GET_NEXT: Agent: 10.2.6.10, First OID: .1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3.1.2.188.48.91.195.241.165“, with a different OID every time.
An snmpwalk of the switch fails with the following, also with different OIDs:
The short answer is no. For the sm_snmpwalk utility there is some logic to try and skip ahead to the next branch of the SNMP MIB, but during discovery, we are attempting to probe specific leaf entries - not just get the full tree.
I would suggest that your course of action here is to talk to support to change the certification for the device which will avoid the problematic spots in the MIB.
SteveLee2
13 Posts
1069
0
Posted August 22nd, 2012 07:00
The question really pertains to discoveries in Smarts. Is there a way to do this in discovery.conf or with sm_tpmgr?