Edwin,

thanks for your answer

Daniel,  the Server manager is for Easy Day toi Day Tasks and tries to ban the Use of Commands.

As ed Mentioned, Data is written Directly to Disk and Special App Informations are stored.

You can also Create the share with Powershell:

New-SmbShare -ContinuouslyAvailable

and check for ca flag with

Get-SmbShare | fl Name,ContinuouslyAvail

Name                  : NETLOGON

ContinuouslyAvailable : False

Name                  : sayno2azureDAG.sayno2azure.local

ContinuouslyAvailable : True

You can change the ca Flag with get-smbshare | Set-SmbShare -ContinuouslyAvailable $True

Multicahnnel however is relatet to TCP Connections Between Client and Server. For each Dedicated TCP ( IP ) Connection between server and CLient, you will get extra Banwith

The smbshare PS Module  has some Powershell CMDlets for Multichannel

PS C:\Users\Administrator> get-command -noun *multichan*

CommandType     Name                                               ModuleName

-----------     ----                                               ----------

Function        Get-SmbMultichannelConnection                      SmbShare

Function        Get-SmbMultichannelConstraint                      SmbShare

Function        New-SmbMultichannelConstraint                      SmbShare

Function        Remove-SmbMultichannelConstraint                   SmbShare

Function        Update-SmbMultichannelConnection                   SmbShare

Karsten

so in that case on VNX you also have to enable CA on File System.

by using server_export with flag type=CA.

It's not enable by default, maybe it change on VNX2 but I don't think

Regards

That's correct, it's not enabled by default on VNX2.

I think it depends on the use case.  SOFS is not intended for applications like home directories (see here for more information http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12786 ).

So this leaves you with Hyper-V and SQL Server as use cases.  In which case, why not use the block devices directly?

Excellent! I would refer to this paper along the call that we had some time ago with Robert Wagner where he described the paper. The recording is here , and the slides are here .

Edwin is right – you can deploy SOFS on CSV on a VPLEX dvol. I wouldn’t necessarily do it, though.

You are correct Edwin. But you can run SQL on normal clustered disks. So I’m having difficulty understanding what would motivate a person to put the SOFS layer in for HyperV and SQL. It adds complexity and cost, and reduces availability.

Paul,

you cannot natively install SQL server databases on CSV disk, you can in simple (clustered-) disk.

ah Paul, you edited your post...

kmgan,

So we are talking about two things here, as I see it:

Option 1 (run two clusters)

Cluster1: CSV clustered disk hosting the Scale Out Fileserver for Applications -- on VPLEX

Cluster2: (no disk) SQL server using SMB3 shares from Cluster1

Option 2 (run one cluster)

Cluster1: non-CSV clustered disk, running SQL server -- on VPLEX

For the question "can you run a Scale Out Fileserver on CSV cluster running on VPLEX"

yes; the "load of the CSV" does not change the storage requirements in regards to supportability on VPLEX (compared to Hyper-V). As VPLEX supports CSV for Hyper-V, it supports CSV for Scale Out Fileserver for Applications.

HTH,

Edwin.

If this answer was useful, please "Mark as Answer" and "Like"

it's possible, but the amount of noise across the VPLEX links as the SMB servers would be actively updating sections of the same VHDXs, in the same block areas as part of active/active and CA could be signiifcant.