Of course a S210 ist better than a X200 but this is Independent of the OneFS release.The Hardware specification is just completely different.
If they don't have any performance issues or planned growth of workflows / load it is just a bad consult to tell them to switch hardware because of onefs8 migration.
furthermore the "correct" successor for X200 would be X210. S210 is a completely other target /workflow audience.
In case you would consult me as customer to switch hardware because of onefs8 migration I would tell you to leave and not come back.
well isilon is scale out so instead of your 3 X200 nodes you could just acquire 10 S210 Nodes to get the same capacity (example, real numbers may differ)... and the sales team is also happy!
sluetze
2 Intern
•
300 Posts
435
0
Posted May 9th, 2017 03:00
OneFS8 is compatible with X200 and S210.
Of course a S210 ist better than a X200 but this is Independent of the OneFS release.The Hardware specification is just completely different.
If they don't have any performance issues or planned growth of workflows / load it is just a bad consult to tell them to switch hardware because of onefs8 migration.
furthermore the "correct" successor for X200 would be X210. S210 is a completely other target /workflow audience.
In case you would consult me as customer to switch hardware because of onefs8 migration I would tell you to leave and not come back.