saranraj456

updated

12 years ago

S

saranraj456

1 Rookie

108 Posts

0

2078

November 3rd, 2014 04:00

VPlex VIAS

Hi Pals

While provisioning Storage with VIAS -vplex do we require any downtime for claiming the storage from backend arrays ?

Do we have any other usage of VIAS ? , what would be the Licensing cost of this

Thanks

Saran

  • ankur.patel

    2 Intern

    286 Posts

    1289

    2

    Posted November 6th, 2014 06:00

    Saran , VIAS will not help with downtime. Understand the reason for downtime is because the WWN of the LUN changes from a backend array WWN to a VPLEX WWN from a host perspective.

  • garyo

    89 Posts

    1289

    2

    Posted November 4th, 2014 13:00

    Hi Saran,

    More details can I believe be found here:

    http://www.emc.com/collateral/white-paper/h13049-provisioning-emc-vplex-integration.pdf

    VPLEX VIAS Demo video:

    VPLEX VIAS demo - reduces time complexity and cost! - YouTube

    I can say that there's no downtime required for claiming storage from the arrays.  I presume you're talking about adding new volumes and presenting them to VPLEX. 

    I'm not sure on the licensing question, I'd reach out to your EMC account rep.

    Thanks,

    Gary

  • saranraj456

    1 Rookie

    108 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 6th, 2014 03:00

    Gary, not about the new volumes , we are planning to migrate data volumes from VNX to VMAX . we need a downtime to encapsulate the backend volumes to storage volumes. So i am just curious with the help of VIAS does the downtime be avoided ?

  • saranraj456

    1 Rookie

    108 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 7th, 2014 02:00

    Thanks ankur, this is what i am looking for

  • garyo

    89 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 10th, 2014 15:00

    Ah I see, thanks for the clarification.  As Ankur says, VIAS doesn't help here.  Fortunately, if it's any consolation, the VPLEX encapsulation is process is a one-time thing (never have to perform it again! :-)

    Gary

  • saranraj456

    1 Rookie

    108 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 10th, 2014 15:00

    Yes , but for migration we need to take little downtime since the LUN variables would vary.

  • saranraj456

    1 Rookie

    108 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 19th, 2014 10:00

    do we need to do any configuration changes for windows host after encapsulation, Just wondered how do we sync the devices

  • 1289

    0

    Posted November 25th, 2014 07:00

    VPLEX does not modify the contents of the underlying lun.  Windows hosts will see the same signature on the lun and use assign appropriate drive letters based on the registry, etc.   All that the hosts sees is a new path to the same device.

  • saranraj456

    1 Rookie

    108 Posts

    1289

    0

    Posted November 26th, 2014 10:00

    Does it applies to all type of host like unix ,AiX , i had a thought that we may need to some config changes at host level after migration.

  • 186

    0

    Posted November 26th, 2014 10:00

    It will vary by host OS, but in general all the host see's is a path change.  VPLEX does not modify the underlying physical disk as part of an encapsulation process.  Some logical volume managers do 'care' about the physical path (for example older AIX and HPUX), but today most Unix's and Linux's are fine with a device path change.  For specifics for your particular host OS you should consult the procedures provided by the SolVeDesktop application.  It is available on support.emc.com.

    Regards,

    -Don