Skip to main content
  • Place orders quickly and easily
  • View orders and track your shipping status
  • Create and access a list of your products
  • Manage your Dell EMC sites, products, and product-level contacts using Company Administration.

Dell FluidFS Version 6.0 Release Notes

PDF

Fixed Issues in FluidFS Version 6.0.140010

The following issues were fixed in FluidFS v6.0.140010:

Area Description
System Functionality User authentication failed with Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers when the functional level was set to Windows Server 2003 and the encryption type was AES-128 or AES-256.
Some applications, such as Novell Storage Manager, requesting to enumerate open files in a given folder or directory (basepath) received faulty results.
Changing ownership (chown) of a file using NFS4 did not reflect in space usage (quota).
When applications requested to lock a byte-range and to ignore the lock sequence, file locks were not honored when using SMB3.
Data Protection Under rare conditions, NDMP backup failed.
NAS Volumes, Shares, and Exports Automatic failback sometimes hung for SMB clients. This release introduces a 5-minute delay in automatic failback to ensure the process completes.
NFS users could not delete .AppleDouble directories because permissions were too strict. This release implements the following Support Shell commands: set-appledouble-access - set default permissions for new .AppleDouble directories and fix-appledouble-access - modify existing directory permissions to current default.
When a client belonged to multiple netgroups, NFS export access was evaluated alphabetically, by netgroup name, and led to unexpected behavior. NFS export access is now evaluated in the order the netgroups are listed.
Failover times for NFS sessions were sometimes longer than expected.

Rate this content

Accurate
Useful
Easy to understand
Was this article helpful?
0/3000 characters
  Please provide ratings (1-5 stars).
  Please provide ratings (1-5 stars).
  Please provide ratings (1-5 stars).
  Please select whether the article was helpful or not.
  Comments cannot contain these special characters: <>()\