Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

8 Professor

 • 

1.9K Posts

 • 

9.7K Points

4953

November 8th, 2018 17:00

Aurora R8 $882 9900k CPU $50 GPU hike? Z370?

Topic: Z370 or Z390 chipset? New R8 Setup Manual lists motherboard as old Z370, not new Z390 chipset; this is either correct and they'll 'recycle' old Z370 motherboard or it's incorrect and they've issued 'new' Z390 motherboard.

Topic: Old Aurora R7 'hidden' $50 GPU price hike carries over to new R8 > see my separate 2nd post ($50 hike not discussed in this post here)

____________________

Topic: True cost of 9900k is ~$882? Read below

Major Finding: 1st buy 9600k (~$332) then also buy 9900k ($550 more) 

Alienware Aurora R8 9th Gen desktop debut is today; to reveal the Aliens clever (& often 'hidden') price schemes, it's still possible to configure the old 8th Gen R7 desktop for clarity & comparison. Please follow closely (note: prices are current & may or may not be subject to change)

Gen8 Base Price $850 (i5 8400) | New Gen9 Base Price $1400 (i7 9600k)

How much does new 9600k CPU probably cost? 1st, price old 8600k:

  • Gen8 base CPU > i5 8400 (Intel MSRP 182)
  • i5 8400 represents ~182 of $850 base price
  • i5 8600k > add 150 (Intel MSRP 257)
  • 8600k now = ~$332 (182 + 150)
  • 332 - 257 MSRP = an 'ok' price

Intel MSRP 8600k vs 9600k = 257 vs 262 ... Conclusion:

  • 8600k & 9600k = 'same price' from Intel
  • 8600k & 9600k should = 'same price' from the Aliens (~332)

_______________________

$850 old base price vs $1400 new base price = $550 more in options

At least for today's debut configurations & prices, the new Gen9 'base' hardware differs from Gen8 base hardware by adding better 9600k (+150) GTX 1070 (+350) liquid cooling (+50) > (150 + 350 + 50 = 550) (1400 - 850 = 550)

We're seeing $550 worth of upgrades today over the old base Gen8 hardware

So let's upgrade old $850 Gen8 to 'same' $1400 Gen9 hardware:

  • if Gen8 = 8600k (150) + 1070 (350) + liquid (50) then Gen8 total now = $1400 (see photo below)
  • base Gen8 + 550 in same upgrades = $1400 = 9th Gen base price 

Conclusion: old 8600k prices = new 9600k prices & those CPU's = ~$332

It's safe to assume 9th Gen $1400 base price means consumer must pay about $332 for base 9600k > When consumer wishes upgrade to 9900k, they must also add $550 more on top of it

 

1st pay ~$332 for 9600k ('included in price') + add 550 more = $882 for 9900k

'Alienware Recommended' for good reason: 9900k Intel MSRP = $488 (photo, earlier)

The Aliens are asking $400 over MSRP, at least on debut ... oh my ... ... ...

Above - so there are no questions: $1400 base price increases +$550 = $1950

  • you do not get a discount for opting up to 9900k
  • you do not get a discount for opting out of 9600k
  • if you did, the new cart price would be $1618 (1400 - 332 + 550)
  • you must 1st buy 9600k, then you must also buy 9900k

that isn't good, that isn't cool at all

The market retail value, discussed later below, for 9900k since its marke debut is / was between $500 - $580 (depending on e-tailer or vendor source)

When the cost of an Alien 9900k is 550 (street value) when you've already payed hundreds for the slightly overpriced $332 (MSRP 262) 9600k?  ... face palm ...

*** Newegg = $280 for 9600k right now today & in stock, they asked $580 for 9900k = $860 for both (280 + 580) --> ~$22 less than the Aliens, for perspective ... ... ...

______________________

9700k price? About $542

Intel MSRP: 374 >< Newegg: 420 >< Aliens: 332 + 210 = 542

* 542 - 374 = 168 over MSRP = 120 over Newegg

... meh ... I've seen worse ... I've seen better

______________________

Afterthought: There is no i5 9400 yet (estimated Intel MSRP $185) - if there were - that would be the new base CPU, & today's or future desktops would or could've been configured 'identical' to 8th Gen specs & price ($850). The Aliens would've been forced today to make 9900k an add $700 option (pay $185 for base 9400 + add 700 more = $885)

What they do is make some piece of hardware 'included in price' (like an 8400, or today like the 9600k), but never make that base price public > it's 'included in price', which makes it subjective, you're free to guess what the true price is but u must guess. From there, they 'trick' consumers, or at least try to, by making 9900k for instance, appear to only be $550, total. The consumer may think $550 is normal, a retail price & competitive at that, relative to say Newegg; I believe they rely on unsuspecting consumers to forget that the initial base CPU must also be payed for 1st; consumer - perhaps in the bliss of ignorance - thinks they payed 550, not 882, the true cost ...
As a continuation of that thought, for instance, if & when i5-9400 is available & if it becomes the new base CPU, & if the Aliens are forced to make it a $700 option, the consumer may think they only payed $700 for 9900k (not 185 + 700 = 885)

If the consumer isn't smart enough to piece the prices together, the Aliens have plausible deniability that they aren't up to no good of course. There should, however, & starting today, be those in the buyer / shopper realm who either do know the true cost of 9900K & those who mistake it for 'just' $550

I mean, who in their right mind will pay ~$882 for a $488 CPU, if the price itself was clearly printed on the sales page ... the true price is hidden behind the 9600k instead ... and for good reason: to conceal the sticker shock

Now, either the base & optional configs & prices will remain in effect or they may change, they may even change once someone at Dellware reads my post here or they may not in spite of it. At the time of debut, these are the prices & this is the reality (subject or not subject to change)

Feel free to discuss these simple conclusions:

  • i5 8400 accounts for estimated $182 of $850 base price
  • 8600k is $150 upgrade = $332 total (182 + 150)
  • if set 8th Gen to 8600k + 1070 + liquid = 1400
  • new 9th Gen 9600k + 1070 + liquid = 1400
  • 8600k = 9600k price = ~$332
  • 1st buy included 9600k then also buy 9900k
  • 332 + 550 = 882
  • 9900k = ~$882 >< MSRP = $488

Indelible in the hippocampus is that 9900k = ~$400 overcharge

 _____________________

Pro Tip: pass, on the $550 extra 9900k upgrade on the sales page

In my estimation, & since Intel is only releasing the top three K CPUs (9600k 9700k 9900k) for now at least, 9600k will be the base CPU offering for the near future & it has an estimated cost of $332 of any 'base price' (today $1400 w/GTX 1070 + liquid) seen on the sales page *see note*

As shown, to buy 9900k from the Aliens directly is to pay $882 & I think you the owner can shop smarter & here's how: Newegg Amazon & Micro Center for instance sell 9900K for about $580, prices may drop in the future as well

A smart shopper would buy the base $332 9600k, buy their own 9900k from elsewhere for about $580 (or less), they may buy / upgrade now or later:

  • buyer KEEPS 9600k
  • buyer gets $580 9900k also

$912 for 9600k + 9900k (332 + 580) vs $882 for just 9900k through the sales page:

  • $30 more you get to keep 9600k, understand? Two CPUs, not one
  • buyer sells or keeps 9600k (money back or hold as known good spare)

If buyer sells 9600k for ~$280 (to recoup), their retail 9900k = $300 less than the sales page (880 - 580)

*9700k street value of $400 / $420 = ~$120 savings off sales page as well

Alienware has always been ok with user upgrades, where it is common to buy base configs & add better hardware later, on your own & often at lower prices; however, your retail 9900k would not be under their warranty or troubleshooting (it will fall under Intel + retailer warranty & you troubleshoot issues on your own)

In the least you can opt for 9600k now & upgrade to 9900k later at a sane price

__________________________

*note: the most likely price drop coming 'soon' to the base config might be they drop the optional $350 GTX 1070 back down to the basic Radeon 560 (in 8th Gens now) - if so - new 9th Gen base price could be 'starting at $1050'

*note: if / when new i5 9400 debuts from Intel, 9th Gen base prices could drop back to $850 / $899 as they used to be: subtract 1070 (-350) subtract liquid cooling (-50) subtract 9600k (-150) --> $1400 base price reverts back to $850 due to subtraction of $550 in today's hardware debut 'upgrades' 

 

1 Message

November 8th, 2018 22:00

I just placed an order with the 9900k option, glad I came across your post. I might have to cancel my order.

Hoping they see this and respond to you.

11 Legend

 • 

33.4K Posts

 • 

112.8K Points

November 9th, 2018 03:00

I don't know if anyone from Dell marketing will read this.  This forum is primarily for existing users with problems and answered by other users.  There is a Dell forum moderator.

 

8 Professor

 • 

1.9K Posts

 • 

9.7K Points

November 9th, 2018 16:00

 

Topic: Old Aurora R7 'hidden $50 price hike' carries over to new R8

RTX 20-Series GRFX Cards launch last September caused me to stay interested in Aurora R7 & now R8 prices, where some funny business caught my eye, so I screen-grabbed prices 7weeks ago, discussed & shown below. My 'investigation' over a small $50 'price hike' is admittedly a minor trifle so feel free to skip over this post, or stay if you're interested; however, $50 does represent that in the face of old ageing end-of-life hardware like Nvidia 10-Series + Intel 8Gen parts, what I thought would be 'discounts' in order to move old stock out to pave way for new was anything but; in fact they found a way to MAKE more money, it's quite clever too in its simplicity

$900 Base Desktop circa Sept 19th: GTX 1050Ti = base GPU

  • GTX 1070 = add 250
  • 8600k + Liquid AIO = add same 150 + 50 (same as today's cost)
  • $1350 total > (900 + 250 + 150 + 50) 

In otherwords, just 7weeks ago, the above hardware cost $1350

Today this same R7 config costs $1400 (as shown in my top post)

Old R7 costs matter because new $1400 R8 base config is its mirror-image

Price on old tech raised $50 on its way out instead of dropped $50 on the way out; because it did, the precedent for the price hike seamlessly carries over to R8 without breaking stride & no one's noticed it

How it happened

1st, they pulled out the better 1050Ti as base GPU, inserted weaker Radeon 560

  • $900 price dropped to $850 = pleasing to consumer's eyes
  • $100 extra now for same 1050Ti >< ALL GPU PRICES GO UP $100
  • $950 now for 1050Ti, not $900
  • $50 price 'drop' nets them $50 more
  • clever, yes?

Again, what used to cost $1350 (8600k 1070 Liquid) now costs $1400 & because it does the R8 'starts at $1400' (as shown prior)

RTX 20-Series & why any of this 'matters':

In the face of a new GPU launch, new RTX cards 'caused' old GTX products to lose value, lose even more value then the fact they were already a year old & aged

The Aliens managed a way to charge $50 more on all GTX 10-Series Cards at the end of their life-cycle & by doing so, perhaps even raised 20-Series cards by $50 more in relative comparison, perhaps

To this day, so long as they offer aged GTX 10-Series along-side new RTX Series as is the case with this new R8 packing a 1070 as the base GPU, yes, it's $50 more than it was prior. More can be said & member input / opinions may differ on the value of GTX 10-Series cards these days, but I made my point that a $50 hike occurred on old tech

Now, one can argue that so long as the buyer stuck with the Radeon 560 at checkout, there was a '$50 off' value in there somewhere for them; all other buyers who picked better AMD Nvidia GPUs off the sales menu were doing so at $100 across-the-board price hikes = $50 more in the face of a $50 off base price (example $850 cart + 1050Ti = $950, not $900 as in September, and so on for all other GPUs on the menu)

Sooner or later, the Aliens will probably yank 1070 as base GPU, drop $1400 base price & reinsert Radeon 560 as base GPU. New 9600k base price 'could' be mapped out using old R7 prices still in effect today:

850 base price includes R560: +150 8600k +50 Liquid AIO = $1050

  • $1150 if adding 1050Ti, for instance (+100 on all other GPUs)
  • $1100 for same 1050Ti last September on that old tech

Lastly, if the Aliens get it in mind that - you know what?! - the base price of Aurora has always been 900 ... we would not want to see a 9600k R560 Liquid AIO 'starting at' $1100 because of the $50 in question

_______________________

How base price looks when i5 9400 launches is an unknown:

  • either starts at $850 (includes R560) & all other GPUs remain $50 more than prior (til supply lasts)
  • Or? Aliens fall in love with Auroras all-but-unchanged 'starting at $900'

If R8 will one day 'start at $900' again with i5 9400 + Radeon 560 as base hardware, & if 10-Series cards are still on the price menu?, why, a 1050Ti config would be what?:

  • $1000
  • 900 + 100 GPU

That'd be a $100 price hike, lol ... yes, because 1050Ti + 8400's were $900

To make things right on this old tech, R8 would need the original 1050Ti & start at $900

Much-to-do indeed over $50, thanks for reading

 

November 11th, 2018 11:00

Very detailed and informative posts you got here.

Just got my R7 in July...now it's "old" *tear*

3 Posts

November 26th, 2018 16:00

Hi There

I am a mom of a tech savvy son. I am getting him a new computer for Christmas (surprise). I thought I did a ton of research on what would be  considered a "good" computer. I ordered the "New Aurora" i7 9th generation. However, after doing more and more research I came across "chip set" and then this post. From what I understand z390 is supposed to be standard in the 9th gen, but its only saying z370. I don't understand computer stats or even most of your post but is this a Dell misprint or did they not put the new Z390 in the New Aurora R8? I hope someone can explain this to me as if they were talking to a 5 year old child. Thank you

10 Wizard

 • 

17.7K Posts

 • 

70.6K Points

November 26th, 2018 19:00


@orkid2877 wrote:

Hi There

I am a mom of a tech savvy son. I am getting him a new computer for Christmas (surprise). I thought I did a ton of research on what would be  considered a "good" computer. I ordered the "New Aurora" i7 9th generation. However, after doing more and more research I came across "chip set" and then this post. From what I understand z390 is supposed to be standard in the 9th gen, but its only saying z370. I don't understand computer stats or even most of your post but is this a Dell misprint or did they not put the new Z390 in the New Aurora R8? I hope someone can explain this to me as if they were talking to a 5 year old child. Thank you


Well, 5-year-olds don't buy computers :Smile:

The "chipset" is on the motherboard and will be the proper one so don't worry.

You want something like this (or better):

Aurora-R8
Intel i7-9700
16gb RAM
Liquid Cooler for CPU
850w Power Supply
512gb M.2 PCIe/NVMe SSD (as bootable C: )
A nice Nvidia video card (like GTX-1070 or better)

Are you going to buy a monitor for it now, or later (let him pick it).

8 Professor

 • 

1.9K Posts

 • 

9.7K Points

November 26th, 2018 20:00

Hi, a new PC for Christmas is generous of you indeed

I'll try to keep things simple

The Powers That Be have explained that the only real difference between z370 / z390 Chipsets is new 'native' support (inside the CPU, not a separate controller on the motherboard) for USB 3.1 Gen2 + integrated WiFi in the new CPU

That isn't the whole story

This new Intel 9900k chip 'the Best Gaming CPU Yet Made', the real story is a new batch of z390 gaming motherboards designed to handle its awesome power needs

New chip comes out, manufacturers re-tool to give it a proper platform to run in

We'd say, last year's boards were meant for last year's CPU, & that something gets lost in the translation when running this year's CPU in last year's board (they didnt know or plan for then what they know now / the new z390 boards are the new plan for the new chip)

Not always, but sometimes it's the case (like this time) that these people launch a new product with out so much as a glimpse of it: all images are done online using CGI or studio shots (sometimes recycled stills); all new sales become a type of 'buying sight unseen'; it isn't until later, after new buyers take delivery & do show & tell over several websites that we'll see '**bleep** the Aliens have launched this time', or browse review samples in the TechPress (there are no reviews or testing data as of today)

I'm not sure if the z370 Chipset is a misprint or not; if it's a misprint it carries over into both the sales page & the specs manual which we'd attribute to lazy employees (they do exist); if it isn't a misprint, to me it means they skimped on the mthrbrd (did not devote R&D to a new product but instead 'recycled' the old one in some way shape or form that lends itself to a cost cut)

Mums buying sons a new PC such as you have, I wouldn't obsess over this

Since we don't know yet what they're making, since no one's reviewed or benchmarked one yet, I guess in a worst case scenario, the CPU runs / maxes out at 4.7GHz or so, but when if in a proper or better built system the same chip could've run at 5.0-5.2GHz as the max

It's about how fast can it go vs how fast could it have gone? Intel sells the K chips as overclocking capable, so the question is always how fast can it go before it craps out? Part of that answer is the motherboard & the cooling, so we wanted to see revisions to the new Aurora in both aspects (better power management & better cooling)

We can't judge the desktop until someone takes delivery or gives an online review with data (& opinion) concerning heat performance clock speeds benchmarks noise watts consumed etc -->we or they might then ask how Aurora stacks up against some other pre-built, but right now it's too early for me at least to answer

Generally, we might ask the head Alien F. Azor a question like: 'is this a z370 or z390 - if it's z370 - why isn't the motherboard updated for power hungry 9900k ???'. (I don't tweet, someone else will have to)

What I'd like to say is that one year, my Mom took it upon herself to buy a new LCD TV, a big one & one I'd never heard of: I would've chosen a different brand, but that's ok. In your case, you chose a name brand computer (with a good warranty) so the big box under the tree should work out (=

The i5 9600k / i7 9700k are probably competent in Aurora (if this is last year's board recycled) --> it is the top dawg 9900k (@$882) where enthusiasts will get passionate about details, like, this is a mainstream chip designed to go 5GHz so does it? If not why not, what holds it back? Mthrbrd & cooling ... these aren't things we tend to bicker over when it's a gift from dear old Mum

 

3 Posts

November 27th, 2018 08:00

This was by far so educational! Thank you so very much for explaining all of that to me. I makes total sense now and I truly appreciate it. I think my biggest concern was just making sure I am getting what I think I am buying. My son is a bit obsessed with computers and I just was hoping that I could educate myself enough to be as enthusiastic about his passion. Again, many thanks!!

3 Posts

November 27th, 2018 08:00

Thank you for taking time to let me know. Much appreciated

10 Wizard

 • 

17.7K Posts

 • 

70.6K Points

November 27th, 2018 10:00


@orkid2877 wrote:

I think my biggest concern was just making sure I am getting what I think I am buying. 


And that's why I answered the way I did.

If you want .... After you find an acceptable and affordable config, you can type it here (in the short format I used) and we can look-over it for you before you order.

 

38 Posts

December 22nd, 2018 05:00

Just for the record, a i5-9600k CPU did not work in Alienware Aurora R7 with latest bios 1.0.17

I was able to use it in a Dell XPS 8930 with the most recent bios update for that computer.

6 Posts

November 2nd, 2019 11:00

Yes they us R7 owners. No bios update for our Z370 motherboards to allow i9 chipsets... but various dell platforms with the exact motherboard have received bios updates for i9 chipsets

No Events found!

Top