Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

2 Intern

 • 

131 Posts

2676

February 19th, 2007 06:00

Navisohere: cannot create raid group: SPA: Array Microcode error

Hi,

iam trying to create a raid group on ATA disks in CX300. there is already a raid group created and a hotspare. but iam trying to create a new raid group of 6 ATAs, it is giving an error:

can not create raid group: SPA: Array Microcode Error: 0x560, SPB: Array Microcode Error: 0x560

please i need help on this

2 Intern

 • 

131 Posts

February 28th, 2007 23:00

i have spoken to EMC and they advised me to do an upgrade from Release 2.19.300.5.019 (currently running) to Release 02.19.300.5.040 as CX300 to deal with ATA drives in a better way.

when it is done, i will inform you for the results.

2 Intern

 • 

131 Posts

March 7th, 2007 00:00

hi again, i have run the navicli command on both SPs and the state of the disk was Unbound. it didn't give neither ENA nor PUP.

March 7th, 2007 03:00

have you opened a Service Request with EMC for this issue? i have a feeling that running zerodisk on the unbound atas might clear your problem but without having analyzed spcollects i'd not do that. i am sure EMC is interested in finding the root cause here as well.

2 Intern

 • 

131 Posts

March 7th, 2007 04:00

yes i have done, EMC adviced me to do an upgrade for the FLARE code after sending them the spcollects. still waiting for the customer to specify a date to do that because as you know, i have to the upgrade while the array is online.

what didi you mean by running the zerodisk on the unbound ATA.

March 7th, 2007 05:00

what didi you mean by running the zerodisk on the


it is an engineering level command and it does exactly what it says, writes 0s to all sectors on the disk. the disk has to be unbound, otherwise FLARE rejects the command. i'm afraid it is not allowed to give out the details for this command here but i guess you could ask your EMC CE to run it for you. still, without knowing the root cause of your problem, i'd not use it and follow the CS suggestions.

76 Posts

March 8th, 2007 06:00

If you really wanted to use the command you could look in the knowledgebase. There is a support solution that gives the command, but I would warn that the command is DANGEROUS and you must be very careful not to zero disks containing data.

However I believe that unbinding and then rebinding performs the same function. This is explained in emc143057.

The situation I would consider this most useful is for array decommissioning. Some companies, like mine, require that no data walks out the door.

March 8th, 2007 07:00

imho, this command is not so dangerous. FLARE rejects it if one tries to zeromark a disk that is part of a raid group even if there are no lun space on it. but i'd like to know why Rami run into this problem in the first place and will the flare upgrade correct it. NDU to latest release is kind of first thing CS typically asks you to do but it is not always the cure...
No Events found!

Top