Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2.2K Posts
0
1504
Celerra Gateway as Backup Target?
I was hoping to get some advice from all the Celerra experts here about a project I am considering.
Currently we have a Windows 2003 file server with 4TB of NTFS shares that are used solely as backup targets for SQL LiteSpeed backup files. The DBAs in my company then use these backups of production SQL servers to restore development environments on a daily basis. The issue we are trying to resolve is that the NTFS shares become so fragmented, from deletion of old backup files and creation of new backup files, that some of the backup files have well over 30,000 file fragments. Backups and restores are taking longer and longer due to the file fragmentation. Periodic formats/degfragmentation of the LUNs are not an option as the shares are pretty much always in use for backups or restores.
The reason I am considering a Celerra, probably a NS-G2, is that we are about to purchase a lot of disk for a DMX4 and will have plenty of extra storage for this project.
So here is what I am thinking. Would the file system that the Celerra implements behind the NAS access layer create the same type of file fragmentation as NTFS file shares? Or would fragmentation not be an issue with the Celerra file system?
Thanks,
Aran
BillStein-Dell
Moderator
Moderator
•
284 Posts
1
August 18th, 2010 13:00
Hi Aran,
Celerra's filesystem is a journaled filesystem called UxFS. There are two main types of data stored in a UxFS filesystem: data blocks, and metadata structures. Within the metadata are things like the superblock, inode tables, information tables, and a cylinder group map. The cylinder group map contains all of the free blocks that are not used for inodes, indirect address blocks or storage blocks. The CG map also keeps track of any fragments to keep disk fragmentation from occurring.
Beneath the filesystem layer is the disk layer, containing RAID groups managed by the storage array, either Symmetrix or CLARiiON. Both storage arrays run their own defrag programs to keep their RAID groups' fragmentation levels low.
Hope this helps
-bill
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
August 18th, 2010 14:00
Bill,
does uxfs get fragmented as much as NTFS does ?
Peter_EMC
674 Posts
1
August 19th, 2010 03:00
see here: https://community.emc.com/click.jspa?searchID=507565&objectType=2&objectID=385728
AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
August 19th, 2010 07:00
Peter,
Thanks for the thread reference. I think that answers my question, but I have a followup question based on your answer below from the refernced thread. You state that the fragmentation should remain constant except when the partition gets very full and there are lots of file creations deletions with extremely funny file sizes.
In our scenario that we are planning on implementing on the Celerra there would be deletion and creation of large amounts of files on a daily basis as this would be for a backup target for database backup files, and the backups are deleted everyday as new backups are written. The backup files range in size from 3GB to 83GB.
Does that fit the exception to the rule or should we still except a low constant fragmentation rate?