7 Technologist

 • 

729 Posts

March 26th, 2013 14:00

Replication is only over the iSCSI network.  I’ve noticed that the documentation isn’t very clear on this point in that it only references the "Group IP" when creating the Partnership.  This is the iSCSI Group IP, as listed on the Group Configuration> General Tab> General Settings seciton.

To Replicate to a remote site, the two groups must be connected through a TCP/IP network with all partner IP’s reachable (Group IP, and all of the member eth interfaces that are on the iSCSI subnets).  Also ICMP and Ports 3260 need to be open.  Obviously, this link MUST be secured, with a firewall, VPN or encryption (or a mixture of them).

Also, you cannot use a NAT’ed IP address from Site A to Site B.

-joe

7 Technologist

 • 

729 Posts

March 26th, 2013 12:00

No, Jumbo isn't required.

The message "No route to host" from the .177 to both .15. and .16 is a problem.  Check your default gateway IP address for all three of these members.

Did you ping/traceroute from the DR back to the SAN group?

-joe

7 Posts

March 26th, 2013 13:00

Pings from the DR site to production:

SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.15 10.0.0.176"
PING 10.0.0.176 (10.0.0.176): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.176: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=0.000 ms

----10.0.0.176 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.000/0.000/0.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.15 10.0.0.177"
PING 10.0.0.177 (10.0.0.177): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.177: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=10.000 ms

----10.0.0.177 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.000/10.000/10.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.15 10.0.0.178"
PING 10.0.0.178 (10.0.0.178): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.178: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=10.000 ms

----10.0.0.178 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.000/10.000/10.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.16 10.0.0.176"
PING 10.0.0.176 (10.0.0.176): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.176: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=10.000 ms

----10.0.0.176 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.000/10.000/10.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.16 10.0.0.177"
PING 10.0.0.177 (10.0.0.177): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.177: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=10.000 ms

----10.0.0.177 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.000/10.000/10.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR> ping "-I 10.1.1.16 10.0.0.178"
PING 10.0.0.178 (10.0.0.178): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.178: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=0.000 ms

----10.0.0.178 PING Statistics----
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.000/0.000/0.000/0.000 ms
SAN-DR>

7 Posts

March 26th, 2013 13:00

The default gateway is on a different netword from the above management ports. The iSCSI traffic is completely segregated from the internet (we put a default GW in because the config said we needed one to continue the setup, the address we put on is not a real gateway).

Do the iSCSI addresses need to be routable to the DR location?

I was thinking the replication would happen over the management network.

Thank you Joe,

-Travis

No Events found!

Top