Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

11 Posts

4238

December 8th, 2012 07:00

How to go about setting up Offsite Tape Backup

Hi All,

I am new to Networker and its been many years since I touched any backup products.

Basically, I have a question about how easy or hard is it to introduce offsite tape rotation so we have a complete set of backups offsite for DR puposes. I have heard it is diffcult so would like your opinons please.

I guess it’s not as simple as the old days when we just take last night backup offsite since there is tape library with a 100 tapes involved? J

Current Setup

· Storagetek SL500 – 1 x Base unit + 2 x CEM or DEM modules (contains 4 x LTO 2 drives and 100 x tapes)

· Using Legato Networker 7.x

· I think on 30 day backup cycle – backing up approx 45TB with over 40 schedules.

· Currently tapes are never taken out.

· We want to introduce offsite tape backup rotation (basically so we have a complete set of backup tapes in safe in case of DR).

Question

  • Quick win - How difficult or easy is it to get a full backup set out so we can put into a safe – clone option of all existing tapes? Would take a long time to do for 100 tapes? and if all the tape slots are full it sounds difficult having to swap existing tapes with new ones for the cloning..?

  • Long term – How difficult is it to introduce a system to rotate tapes out of the library for offsite storage? E.g. a number of tapes are ejected out daily from library and taken offsite and old ones put back in?

Thanks in advance

ECL

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 14th, 2012 14:00

This entirely depends on your resources.  If those tape drives are in constant use, duplicating tapes will just jam more those resources (at least 2 drives). Exporting out should not be a problem as long as you have place where to export them and transport them safely along with media management in place. Nowadays, at least for backups, this sort of approach is abandoned, but with tapes I guess that's what you do.  And since you have LTO2 (as stated), that's not going to be face melting operation for sure...

11 Posts

December 14th, 2012 15:00

Hi, Thanks for your reply.

Can you explain what you mean when you say  "Exporting out should not be a problem as long as you have place where to export them and transport them safely along with media management in place...."

What do you mean by exporting out and transport and media management? (are these networker processes?)

-do you mean clone and then eject the tape? what do you mean by place to export them? you mean free slots? or you talking about a fire proof safe to store the tapes?

We are also thinking of replacing some of the drives with LTO5 whoch should then free up some slots.

Yes, this tape is old technology and will be replaced with datadomain later.

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 16th, 2012 04:00

ecl wrote:

Can you explain what you mean when you say  "Exporting out should not be a problem as long as you have place where to export them and transport them safely along with media management in place...."

What do you mean by exporting out and transport and media management? (are these networker processes?)

Well, I know of example where tapes are being exported and kept in trunk of the car.  That's not some once upon the time example, but rather current one   Of course, it is extreme, but still you must ensure that your tapes are secured otherwise why exporting them out (outside library). If, and when transported, you must keep an eye on having media managemnt (location and transport in case of restore/DR) in place with all auth mechanisms in place.

If you plan to go with DD, as mentioned, you will most likely replicate data which, from my point of view, gives you remote site/appliance protection, but not out of site (since data is not exported).  If that is not needed, then you don't have to export tapes today neither.

11 Posts

December 17th, 2012 13:00

Oh right I get you now and thanks for our reply.

What I was looking for was options for quickest way to get an offsite tape backup set. Tape slots already all full so whats best option?

buy another dem/cem with extra 2 drives then populate with new blank tapes and setup a job to clone each tape?

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 18th, 2012 08:00

If exporting tapes is an option, within house, go for it.  Once you move to disk option (eg. Data Domain) you won't use much tapes at all (perhaps for long term backups). Exporting tapes out is not such a big deal and takes couple of minutes (to more, depending on size and speed and of course location).

11 Posts

December 18th, 2012 13:00

Hi, does tape clone take long time e.g. how long to clone for LTO2? Thanks

155 Posts

December 18th, 2012 23:00

Hi ECL,

Well cloning doesent take extra time or anything as such, its a process in which data is read from one tape and written onto another tape, the only fact of concern to you should be ,cloning will keep two drives from your environment busy for the time its running.....and as per the details shared above it appears like your library is busy all the time taking backup........you will have to do cloning in non Backup running hours .......again completion of cloning depends on the data thats getting backedup daily.....which in turn will be cloned..

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 18th, 2012 23:00

I really don't remember, but if you are using 2 drives on same system then your limit will cime from either:

- speed of HBA (be aware if both drives share same HBA that they will also share pipe)

- speed of drive (unless you hit HBA/PCI limitation you should be able to drive those drives up to max)

11 Posts

December 19th, 2012 01:00

Hi All, Tape library is "currently full with over 100 tapes" and practically backing up all the time.

As its "full" there is no spare slots to put in new blank tapes and also drives are always busy doing backup jobs.

So are you sugguesting best to extend the tape library with extra drives and tape slots so it can also do cloning of all the tapes?

40 Posts

December 19th, 2012 07:00

If you put your offsite tapes in their own pool you can eject the "full" tapes from a script (you'll need the library address of your tape library and the media pool name of the offsite pool).  This is a script for linux.

mminfo -a -r "volume,location,pool,volretent" -q "full" |grep OffsitePoolName |grep LibraryAddress |grep -v "expired">ejectlist.txt

cat "ejectlist.txt" | while read TapeNumber
do
echo "Ejecting $TapeNumber..."
/usr/sbin/nsrjb -j LibraryAddress -w $TapeNumber
done

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 19th, 2012 07:00

I'm not sure what retention you use, but you can always export out full tapes and put in new tapes - even on daily basis if this is some tape library where people are and can pick up the tapes and place them where necessary.

40 Posts

December 19th, 2012 08:00

That's what we ended up doing because we'd cycle through a whole lot of tapes during the week.

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 19th, 2012 11:00

I've been using VTL since 2006 and I can't tell you what kind of relief that was compared to PTL. I recently switched to Data Domain and tested both VTL and DD Boost devices and I have to admit results were better than I expected.  From operational point of view, for pure backups, tape is overhead.  For archiving, I would argue not (depending what sort of restore requirements and compliancy you would have).

11 Posts

December 19th, 2012 14:00

Hi thanks for all your helpful advice so far. But I am still not sure what the best option it to quickly implement a offsite backup rotation.

Currently, "NO" tapes have ever been removed and the retention is 30 days with over 40 jobs running taking full backups and incremental backups on over 100 tapes in various media pools (so ALL tapes are in use).

There is "NO" free slots to put in blank tapes for cloning. The backup team are telling me it is difficult to implement a offsite backup rotation as all tapes are either in use or become part of the expiring backup set ready to be over written.

I am still waiting for a solution from the backup team hence posted on this forum to see what are the easiest options to get a offsite backup rotation in place where all tapes slots are in use in the tape library.

An option I think that maybe possible is to expand the PTL with extra drives and tape slots for new blank tapes and then modify the existing jobs to clone as each tape is filled?

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

December 19th, 2012 15:00

Well, adding new tape drives will create havoc most likely as I don't imagine you can buy LTO2 drives nowadays and mixing LT05/LTO6 with LTO2 - let's just say that won't work. Instead, if you are going to keep the physical drives, upgrade them to LTO4/5/6 (given that SL500 would support those) and with new media you get much more capacity than with LTO2.  From what you say, your rotation works, but you are on the edge with capacity.  If you put numbers down on paper, you will find that 2 drives with some tapes will cost you the same as DD160.  So, if looking to expand this in short/mid term, explore rather these two alternatives.  DD160 is cheap are rather handy thing (and if you more a bit more of spca, 620 then).

0 events found

No Events found!

Top