Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
7 Posts
0
686
May 30th, 2008 01:00
Poor performance cloning from VTL to physical LTO3 - NW733, Solaris 9
We have NetWorker 7.3.3 running on Solaris 9 on a beefy Sun V440. I backup to VTL and then make a clone to take off-site. My problem is that clone speed is about half the speed it should be which seriously impacts my backup windows.
The VTL is connected with FC and the LTO3 drives with U320 SCSI.
Even though I can read data from the VTL at over 140MB/s and write to LTO3 tapes at 105MB/s I can only get a maximum of 69MB/s for cloning speed. I have done speed tests using dd, save and recover which all match exactly.
Before I implemented the VTL I used the same disks as an AFT device and I could clone or stage from AFT to LTO3 at anywhere from 100MB/s to 150MB/s (depending on the compressibility of the data). So clearly there is no underlying hardware issue.
I suspect that the tape subsystem in Solaris 9 is to blame here as the only thing that has changed is that Solaris now treats the VTL disks as a tape rather than a disk now. It is interesting that my clone speed is almost exactly half the speed of the VTL as if it is getting a block of data from the VTL, then sending it to tape and then getting another block from the VTL and so on.
Has anyone else seen this? If so will upgrading to Solaris 10 fix it?
The VTL is connected with FC and the LTO3 drives with U320 SCSI.
Even though I can read data from the VTL at over 140MB/s and write to LTO3 tapes at 105MB/s I can only get a maximum of 69MB/s for cloning speed. I have done speed tests using dd, save and recover which all match exactly.
Before I implemented the VTL I used the same disks as an AFT device and I could clone or stage from AFT to LTO3 at anywhere from 100MB/s to 150MB/s (depending on the compressibility of the data). So clearly there is no underlying hardware issue.
I suspect that the tape subsystem in Solaris 9 is to blame here as the only thing that has changed is that Solaris now treats the VTL disks as a tape rather than a disk now. It is interesting that my clone speed is almost exactly half the speed of the VTL as if it is getting a block of data from the VTL, then sending it to tape and then getting another block from the VTL and so on.
Has anyone else seen this? If so will upgrading to Solaris 10 fix it?
No Events found!


ble1
6 Operator
•
14.4K Posts
•
56.2K Points
1
May 30th, 2008 05:00
rcorran
7 Posts
0
May 30th, 2008 07:00
Thanks,
Rob
rcorran
7 Posts
0
May 31st, 2008 06:00
Did some testing today. It is definitely NOT caused by multiplexing. Did some tests with dd and with nsrclone and got the same results. About 69MB/s when I should be getting a minimum of 100MB/s (more with compression on LTO3).
Brings me back to thinking that is is caused by the tape driver architecture in Solaris 9.
Thanks,
Robert
ble1
6 Operator
•
14.4K Posts
•
56.2K Points
0
June 1st, 2008 23:00