This post is more than 5 years old
5 Posts
0
1576
exchange cluster reconfig from storage node to dedicated storage node
I have a clustered exchange solution which is saved normally through a "general" storage node. This is working properly. Here are some of the confiuration settings which may be helpful.....
backup command: nsrxchsv -a mailhost
Storage node: stn101 & nsrserverhost
recover storage node: stn101 & nsrserverhost
mailhost is a virtual, the physical cluster nodes are pr01 & pr02.
I would now like to route traffic through the dedicated storage node. This is a clustered environment. The client name is mailhost. I am in the process of creating dedicated stroage nodes on each cluster node (pr01 & pr02). Can I simply change the storage node entry from stn101 to mailhost? Will this work? Thank you
Andy
ble1
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
14.3K Posts
0
December 5th, 2009 10:00
I assume you are talking about curphyhost (was that changed to nsrphyhost??). This is used for save operations... for read operation, for recover storage node for example, use currechost.
HCLBACKUP
150 Posts
0
December 4th, 2009 00:00
HCLBACKUP
150 Posts
0
December 4th, 2009 05:00
HCLBACKUP
150 Posts
0
December 4th, 2009 05:00
andrewrgray
5 Posts
0
December 4th, 2009 05:00
Thank you for the reply. That will certainly work for non clustered applications.
I have a 2 node active passive cluster. One physical node is active and the other physical node is passive at any given time. I would like to save the active node only and I do not have any failover control or notice. The configured client name is mailhost. The mailhost entry (rather than the physical) works for either node and will only back up the active node. I am looking to do the same for the dedicated storage node and I am not sure if this will work.
andrewrgray
5 Posts
0
December 4th, 2009 05:00
My appologies for my misunderstanding. I will try that. Thank you so much.
andrewrgray
5 Posts
0
December 7th, 2009 06:00
HCLBACKUP
150 Posts
1
December 9th, 2009 03:00
andrewrgray
5 Posts
0
December 9th, 2009 05:00