Connections issues on Radius configured switches

Question

Hi, we are moving from Cisco to DELL and so we bought some DELL N3048-ON Switches and stack the to gether.  We have a environment with 802.1x / Radius.  I build a Switch configuration with our radius settings included, the ports are in general mode. In our testings, we didn't noticed that there are some Problems in general mode....  If a Port is in general mode some clients are not visible on that port. The client is not reachable via PING and the mac address is not visible in the mac address table.it does not matter if I ping from a different subnet or from the sam subnet and vlan. The mac address is not visible until the device generates more traffic  For example: I send Ping from the device to another device  A perfect example is a temperature logger, this device sends traffic every minute. Some times the device is flapping... If the device sends traffic, I can reach the device. When the device stops sending traffic the device isn't reachable anymore I connected a Cisco Switch to one of the uplink ports of our N3000 switches and configured the port as trunk -> No Problems on the Cisco Switch ! All devices came up directly I configured the affected vlans as static vlans on my switche I configured a port in access mode on the same switch ... some times its working... sometimes not :( I made a factory reset and configured the switch without radius settings and ports in access mode -> working   Very strange and confusing problems ... Does anyone has any idea? Of couse, I opened a support ticket, but they couldn't help me and he escalated the ticket to 3rd level support.    Greetings Tobias

DELL-Josh Cr · Answer

Hi,Is the firmware up to date? If you private message me the service request or the service tag I can take a look.

Bias89 · Answer

Hi,

yes, the firmware is the newest version for that switch.
We also updated the firmware on our Cisco Catalyst 4500e Core Switch to exclude that der is a problem between Dell & Cisco.

But without success.

Greetings

Tobias

Bias89 · Answer

Hi,

actually the problem is not resolved... and I don't have any idea what I can do.

But I don't think it's a Radius problem. I think that the N Series and our Cisco Catalyst speak a different Rapid-PVST language and that cause the problems.

What I figured out:

It's maybe not a firmware bug, we tested N3000Advv6.5.3.37, N3000Advv6.5.3.36 and N3000AdvLitev6.5.3.3
N3000AdvLitev6.5.3.3 is working on other DELL Stacks without that problem
We connected the not working DELL Stack to the same CORE-Switch like the working DELL-Stack --> Does not resolve the problem
We removed the Portchannel config from the Stack
If I change the Uplink port from TE2/0/1 to any other TE Port on that switch, Spanning-Tree put that port into discarded mode and says that he is the root-bridge... If I disable Spanning Tree everything is working fine and all devices are reachable. We also disabled all other ports to exclude that the issue is caused by a connected device --> Issue persists
If I plug back into TE2/0/1 the port is back in forwarding state (root role and the root ID is correct)
The TE Ports have the same configuration (also on the cisco side)
If I connect a CISCO Access Switch to the Dell Stack (trunk), configure a port in the same vlan and connect a device to that port, the device is reachable immediately. The interessting point: In that case, the devices on the Dell STACK are reachable without any problems too !
The problem exists on VLAN Interfaces on that switch too !
If I start a ping from that vlan interface to any device which is not connected to the Stack (for example the gateway or just google.de) the IP is also reachable remote... after stopping the ping the device isn't reachable anymore.
The problem exists only on vlans with low traffic on that switch. For Example vlan 100 has many clients like Notebooks and PCs and that is working well, also a configured VLAN Interface IP is reachable remotely.
The VLAN 150 has only a few clients active on that switch and if I configure a vlan interface on that switch I do have the same issue.

Maybe someone have any idea?

Tobias

Bias89 · Answer

Hi,I made a small overview about our network topology&#xa0;

RJCMpcr · Answer

Hi Tobias. Did you manage to solve this problem?

RJCMpcr · Answer

Hi Tobias. Did you manage to solve this problem?

Networking General

Was this post helpful?