I have 2 x 6248 switches that need to be linked over a distance of 150m. i was wanting to use fiber and link aggregation to do this. We could get away with a single fiber cable but having them linked would be nice. i really could do with some simple steps on how to set this up. is it just the case of adding the 2 fiber ports to a LAG and thats it? thanks Nigel
Basically, a LAG does increase bandwidth beyond the bandwidth of a single port but it depends greatly on the traffic pattern.
Traffic for a singe flow (between a given source and destination) always traverse the same port in the LAG.
If you have multiple flows between different ends (the flow is determine by the MAC of the source & destination in a particular way - see the paper) then these flows are distributed between all ports within the LAG.
So if you have lots of different traffic flows from different source and destinations then all those flows are distributed through the ports within the LAG so you do overall increase the bandwidth capacity of the link.
channel-group 1 mode auto - this creates a LACP LAG
Or
channel-group 1 mode on - this creates a static LAG
So, all you need to do is go into each port you wish to be a member of your LAG and enter either of the above. If you want ports to participate in different LAG groups then you just increment the channel-group number.
when you say source MAC and Destination MAC, will they be the Client PC's talking to the servers and not actually the switches ports? i'll read that link now thanks Nigel
Adam, Sorry for highjacking this thread, but does this work equally as well on a Dell server with Broadcom dual NIC's.? I looked at the traffic on both ports, and noticed that one had much more traffic then the other. Thanks
ProductManager
12 Posts
0
March 14th, 2007 01:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 14th, 2007 10:00
ProductManager
12 Posts
0
March 14th, 2007 17:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 12:00
Adam N
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
Adam N
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
Adam N
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
Adam N
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
NigelRobson
1 Rookie
•
54 Posts
0
March 15th, 2007 14:00
StarLog
2 Intern
•
203 Posts
0
March 21st, 2007 00:00